It seems you need another refresher. You responded to me, not me to you.
Again, that is exactly how majorities work. You're using the same math as me to determine that a majority of voters didn't vote for Trump. By what right can you make the claim "derp, dat's now how majorities work, derp, lol I'm stupid." You are literally looking at the same numbers as me, and drawing the exact same conclusions. Except, as I said, for this: Hillary Clinton did not win a majority of the votes cast, did not win a majority of the states, and did not win a majority of the electorate. At least Donald Trump won a majority of the states and a majority of the electorate.
If you agree with all of those facts, why did you responded to my posts saying, "derp, that's not how majorities work." That is, in fact, EXACTLY how majorities work. What was your point in saying that's not how majorities work if, in fact, you now admit that is indeed exactly how they work?
No, you didn't. You never said 53% of the "people" didn't vote for Trump. You didn't say that until page 6 of this debate. You started this argument on page one by quoting my accurate claim about Clinton not winning a majority of the votes by saying "derp, that's not how majorities work."
You only tried to back-pedal and change your argument on page 6 when you realized how weak and inaccurate your snarky claims of "derp, that's not how majorities work" was. That is exactly how majorities work.
Yes, Trump didn't win a majority of the votes. Neither did Clinton. He did win a majority of states and a majority of the electorate. So what is your ultimate point? What do you want to say? It's page 7 here, buddy, time to put a cohesive argument together.
Then why did you challenge mathematically true claims with ridiculously inaccurate responses like, "derp, that's not how majorities work cuz I'm too stupid to know better, derp"?
Deflect from what? What claim is even being made in this thread? I'm not deflecting from anything, I'm educating. You're just embarrassed everyone was here to see it, Irrational Poster.