- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 9,990
- Reaction score
- 888
I did own that I should have been clearer on that part, even though it was blatantly obvious what was being said. This is Sherdog, I’m not exactly putting TLC into every post, it’s just not that important. But you have a habit of completely ignoring the point and focusing on irrelevant details. You haven’t even attempted to rebut my point about the flaws in your per capita arguments, where by the way, the US won 15% of the total gold medals with only 4% of the world’s population. Despite as you say, specializing in our own unique sports. Yes, other countries did even better in a per capita sense, but it’s much harder to overachieve in a per capita sense when you have well over 300 million people. Some countries would automatically perform better in a per capita sense than the US if they simply won one single gold medal.Nothing more to add to this really. You simply should’ve been clearer.
“any county with a large population is always going to be “mid-tier” on a per capita basis in the Olympics”
As I said, that is blatantly untrue. Own it.
Again, you’ve added an “only” to my original statement. Language is important when it’s all we have to communicate, so do try to be accurate. The major sports in the US are sports very few other countries take seriously. For the vast majority of the world, they don’t have that luxury. You dominate these sports in a manner that you don’t dominate any others (as far as I can see at least), hence you specialise in these sports. It really isn’t rocket science.
If we’re being fair, you were very dismissive and cheeky in the post I responded to. Quipping about a-level athletes and then talking about how the US isn’t necessarily a poor sporting nation, but definitely specialize in our own sports, which is an objectively silly way to try to summarize the sporting prowess of a country that wins the Olympics going away almost every time.