- Joined
- Sep 9, 2012
- Messages
- 4,581
- Reaction score
- 4,051
He's right. She's a disgusting slob. If that's the best image they could shoop and airbrush for the cover, you just know she looks much more horrid in reality.
Eh yea until 80% of them are in the hospital because of covid which makes leaders shut down businesses among other things and not tackle the health problem
This by far isn't even the worst case of the plus size models on magazine covers trend. This chick is pretty much on the line of what I would call fat. Solid and chubby yes but not at all blatantly obese.
Peterson is shooting himself in the foot here. If it were this particular magazine cover it would have been justified:
Look her up. She's fucking enormous. Pretty though, if nowhere near her potential if she lost half her mass. Chick is in morbidly obese territory without question.This by far isn't even the worst case of the plus size models on magazine covers trend. This chick is pretty much on the line of what I would call fat. Solid and chubby yes but not at all blatantly obese.
Peterson is shooting himself in the foot here. If it were this particular magazine cover it would have been justified:
The cover of what, praying mantis quarterly?I have found most Peterson haters to be pathetic POS losers.
PS I have seen a good chunk of his videos and read his books.
He is right though. His problem is with the left's attack on beauty...whether is be a big great fat person or trans on the cover of say the swimsuit issue.
I love asian women and this woman is fat and not hot.... I mean, we finally get an asian woman on the cover and she is a fat pig.
Now, JP should not quit twitter over the crying... he should be used to that by now.
Put this woman on the damn cover!
Yes they should have stood up. No possible loss of job isnt an excuse to abandon your principles. If you did you arent principled and essentially worship money. I wore the mask at work. I told my boss straight up require the shot and i will leave on the spot. Resourceful people find a way and im no ones fucking slave. You dont own me and you cant force me to take an experimental shot with absolutely no one guaranteeing if im hurt or killed my family will be take care of. If you took the shot to keep your job youre a bitch, its just the truth.Many big companies required vaccines or they fired you. Are you saying people should sacrifice their jobs, livelihood, house, supporting their families all to not be a fool? Perhaps there are levels to mistrust and some people will take their chances on something they vehemently disagree with when the alternative is certain monetary and other pain
obviously fake
Lol at calling this "authoritarian"
look who up? the chick in this thread or the magazine I posted?Look her up. She's fucking enormous. Pretty though, if nowhere near her potential if she lost half her mass. Chick is in morbidly obese territory without question.
I get what JP is doing by calling bullshit on gaslighting in media, but something as subjective as beauty isn't where he should be drawing the line. Could have called out the fact that SI put a dangerous unhealthy person on their cover instead of how he worded it. Be more specific, in other words. I doubt he'd have said something similar if it was Sarah Jessica Parker on the cover.
The chick in the OP. There's no doubt as to the status of the butterball you posted. She's exceptional! Lollook who up? the chick in this thread or the magazine I posted?
I still remember Rogan calling her a giant gelatinous bag of meat, or something like that lolThis by far isn't even the worst case of the plus size models on magazine covers trend. This chick is pretty much on the line of what I would call fat. Solid and chubby yes but not at all blatantly obese.
Peterson is shooting himself in the foot here. If it were this particular magazine cover it would have been justified:
A few days ago he made a comment about a plus size model who got put on the cover of Sport Illustrated
While I get where he's coming from and don't really think that woman is attractive enough to be on the cover, I just thought it came off kind of nasty and immature the way Jordan Peterson worded it. I'd be lying if I said that I didn't lose a little bit of respect for him after that
He then got lots of backlash because of his comments then posted another series of tweets about how bad twitter is for people and that he will be stepping away, yet he's continued posting. I'm seriously wondering about the guy's mental health now and if he's developed another addiction
Yes, there's a lot wrong with Peterson these days. I used to like some of his stuff and I think he used to make really interesting points about things.
But fame has been pretty cruel to him, and probably has him living in a bit of an echo chamber. He's had to make a very abrupt adjustment late in life from academic to celebrity book shill. Lastly, addiction and disease wreaked havoc on his life.
Today he seems like a husk of the guy who burst on to the scene following his Cathy Newman interview. He's not just intellectually or ideologically outraged, he's angry and bitter and lashing out at cable TV talking points. He's gone from fighting compelled speech to calling bathing suit catalogs authoritarian.
To be fair there have been other periods in time when a woman being a bit obese was celebrated. It meant that they were fertile, capable of childbirth and not malnourished, like most people would've been.
The woman in that cover is pretty similar to the body type you'll find in a lot of historical paintings.