- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 23,867
- Reaction score
- 5,925
How is it debatable? It was illegally purchased and he was underage.
Its been brought up in the thread a number of times, but reading through the statute you can see how it can be argued that a 17 year old isnt, technically, violating any statutes. My understanding was the purchase was legal, but it wasnt Kyles gun. But there could be info I missed.