Social Mayor of St. Louis doxes people who want to defund the police then she get's doxed

yes because in Orwellian world of the left, the word DEFUND does actually mean defund. No one should take you dangerous evil communist seriously, and mind you, they aren’t. People are just scared to be doxxed.
Orwell was a socialist and a support of the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.
His work is characterised by lucid prose, biting social criticism, opposition to totalitarianism, and outspoken support of democratic socialism

I also recommend the book he wrote Homage To Catalonia.
Practically every building of any size had been seized by the workers and was draped with red flags or with the red and black flag of the Anarchists; every wall was scrawled with the hammer and sickle and with the initials of the revolutionary parties … All this was queer and moving. There was much in it that I did not understand, in some ways I did not even like it, but I recognized it immediately as a state of affairs worth fighting for.

He actually took the side of the antifa of old in the Spanish Civil War, stating his goal was to kill a fascist.

Dude was a die hard Democratic Socialist you dunce.
 
I don't support doxing, but the people pushing for defunding the police are putting everyone at risk. I really wish they could do this in purely leftist neighborhoods so they could see what kind of nightmare they are creating. I would like to believe that it would cure them of their insanity but maybe I'm asking too much.
 
I don't support doxing, but the people pushing for defunding the police are putting everyone at risk. I really wish they could do this in purely leftist neighborhoods so they could see what kind of nightmare they are creating. I would like to believe that it would cure them of their insanity but maybe I'm asking too much.

I have an honest couple of questions, to grasp your opinion on the subject so I may better understand your point of view.

1) Do you agree with the legislation Colorado is passing? You can find a quick overview of the changes here. The police seem to also be on the side of the changes.
https://www.cpr.org/2020/06/03/colo...text=June 2, 2020.,and reported to the public.

2) Do you think that there is a major issue with the way the police deals with mentally ill people? It's no secret that if you have a family member going through an episode or mental breakdown, calling the police more often than not leads to an escalation that can end either in the death of that family member, someone being hurt, or someone being imprisoned. I'll not even blame the LEOs on that point, they simply do not have the training and their training towards dealing with criminality absolutely does not help in those situations.
I'm going to link you to an ACLU article that I would very much like you to read as it honestly breaks down my opinions on the matter and why I'm taking part in the protests. That way we could have an honest discussion about both our concerns on this topic.

https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/defunding-the-police-will-actually-make-us-safer/
I'll quote what I find to be the most pressing of concerns.
We have little evidence, if any, to show that more police surveillance results in fewer crimes and greater public safety. Indeed, funneling police into communities of color and pushing officers to make arrests just perpetuates harm and trauma. Yet since the 1980s, spending on law enforcement and our criminal legal system has dramatically outpaced that in community services such as housing, education, and violence prevention programs. Those are the institutions that help build stable, safe, and healthy communities.

For example, Los Angeles’s budget gives police $3.14 billion out of the city’s $10.5 billion. Spending on community services such as economic development ($30 million) and housing ($81 million) pale in comparison to the massive LAPD budget. (On Wednesday night, after years of Black Lives Matter grassroots activists demanding a cut in LAPD’s budget, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti announced he would cut $100 million to $150 million from the LAPD budget and reinvest those funds in communities of color.) Similarly, in New York City, the government spends almost $6 billion on policing, which is more than it does on the Department of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community development combined.
 
Orwell was a socialist and a support of the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.

Oh yes because yesterday’s Spanish anti-fascist are akin to today’s? Yeah rightc

I also recommend the book he wrote Homage To Catalonia.


He actually took the side of the antifa of old in the Spanish Civil War, stating his goal was to kill a fascist.

Dude was a die hard Democratic Socialist you dunce.
Orwell was a socialist and a support of the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.


I also recommend the book he wrote Homage To Catalonia.


He actually took the side of the antifa of old in the Spanish Civil War, stating his goal was to kill a fascist.

Dude was a die hard Democratic Socialist you dunce.

You imbecile, the anti-fascists of yesterday share absolutely nothing in common with the domestic terrorists antifa today. Of course being the leech you are you would like to attach your buffoonery to a noble cause like theirs. You think Orwell would approve of the doublespeak you looney trans use today? You are NOT anti fascists in the true sense of the world, you are akin authoritarian jackboots like the communists.
 
I really hope nothing bad happens to her house.

Also, she should be impeached or repealed or whatever the process is to remove a mayor over this incident. Seriously.
 
You imbecile, the anti-fascists of yesterday share absolutely nothing in common with the domestic terrorists antifa today. Of course being the leech you are you would like to attach your buffoonery to a noble cause like theirs. You think Orwell would approve of the doublespeak you looney trans use today? You are NOT anti fascists in the true sense of the world, you are akin authoritarian jackboots like the communists.
Oh this will be fun.

The anti fascists of yesteryear believed far more in using violence against fascism. Lets look at the Cable Street Riots, when Jewish and Irish workers, sided with communists and anarchists to physically smash the Black Hat march. I highly suggest researching Moseley and compare his speeches with a lot of what you seem to be preaching.


An estimated 300,000 anti-fascist demonstrators turned out Over 10,000 police, including 4,000 on horseback, attempted to clear the road to permit the march to proceed. The demonstrators fought back with sticks, rocks, chair legs and other improvised weapons. Rubbish, rotten vegetables and the contents of chamber pots were thrown at the police by women in houses along the street. After a series of running battles, Mosley agreed to abandon the march to prevent bloodshed. The BUF marchers were dispersed towards Hyde Park instead while the anti-fascists rioted with police.
That moment, that beautiful moment, is now immortalized on that street.

Now lets get into Orwell. Very very important figure for Democratic Socialists. A bit more violent than the modern Antifa, as he believed in murdering Fascists. Since you are so unaware on Orwell being a DIE HARD socialist I'll school you since you're so willfully uninformed. Consider it free education.

Perhaps one of my favorite quotes, as socialists and staunch Marxists tend to greatly differ on ideology.
I have no particular love for the idealised "worker" as he appears in the bourgeois Communist's mind, but when I see an actual flesh-and-blood worker in conflict with his natural enemy, the policeman, I do not have to ask myself which side I am on.
Weird. Weird right? Super weird really. I wonder whose side he would be on? but let's dive into his time serving with Communists.
The workers' militias, based on the trade unions and each composed of people of approximately the same political opinions, had the effect of canalizing into one place all the most revolutionary sentiment in the country. I had dropped more or less by chance into the only community of any size in Western Europe where political consciousness and disbelief in capitalism were more normal than their opposites. Up here in Aragón one was among tens of thousands of people, mainly though not entirely of working-class origin, all living at the same level and mingling on terms of equality. In theory it was perfect equality, and even in practice it was not far from it. There is a sense in which it would be true to say that one was experiencing a foretaste of Socialism, by which I mean that the prevailing mental atmosphere was that of Socialism. Many of the normal motives of civilized life--snobbishness, money-grubbing, fear of the boss, etc.--had simply ceased to exist. The ordinary class-division of society had disappeared to an extent that is almost unthinkable in the money-tainted air of England; there was no one there except the peasants and ourselves, and no one owned anyone else as his master. Of course such a state of affairs could not last. It was simply a temporary and local phase in an enormous game that is being played over the whole surface of the earth. But it lasted long enough to have its effect upon anyone who experienced it. However much one cursed at the time, one realized afterwards that one had been in contact with something strange and valuable. One had been in a community where hope was more normal than apathy or cynicism, where the word 'comrade' stood for comradeship and not, as in most countries, for humbug. One had breathed the air of equality. I am well aware that it is now the fashion to deny that Socialism has anything to do with equality. In every country in the world a huge tribe of party-hacks and sleek little professors are busy 'proving' that Socialism means no more than a planned state—capitalism with the grab-motive left intact. But fortunately there also exists a vision of Socialism quite different from this. The thing that attracts ordinary men to Socialism and makes them willing to risk their skins for it, the 'mystique' of Socialism, is the idea of equality; to the people Socialism means a classless society, or it means nothing at all. And it was here that those few months in the militia were valuable to me.
It seems VERY clear that you've not read much Orwell. I highly recommend it, as you're quoting a die hard socialist who fought alongside communists and anarchists against Capitalists and Fascists.

Let us go to Wallace on the subject.
“If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States.”
-Henry A. Wallace

Now silly little man, source me the differences in modern Antifascist thought compared to those of old. If you would like to learn about the history of Antifa, Mark Bray wrote an incredible book on the subject that traces it from its origins to the current day actions of the group.

You've also said there would be war before socialism reaches America, and yet you've accepted Social Security as socialist (Libertarians oppose it for that reason) so which is it chelb?
 
If a letter to the mayor is terrorism, War Room posts must be genocide.
Holocaust!
"Genocide" just doesn't carry the weight of the offense.

P.s. yo, faulty, who da Hitler in yo av? Can't quite place him.
 
The silent majority seems to be behind us though. Look at all those laws changing. Look at all those statues to traitors being torn down. That weirdo who defends pedophiles Tucker Carlson even said BLM is more popular than the president. Whatcha going to do if he loses and the DNC takes congress. That's going to be a big change of life for you isn't it? The US will never be the same, but it won't even if Trump wins. This is your new normal broseph, and there's nothing you can do to stop us. We'll be marching in those streets no matter what happens in November.


You see, us socialists believe in helping each other out. There are plenty of local bail funds to assist the brave men and women out there marching for change. Would you like me to link you to a local group so you can make sure we can keep the streets full of patriots?

theres something nefarious about all this. i think your being setup to fail.
 
Calling to defund the police is terrorism. No different than NASCAR pulley nooses.

Welcome to the game.

No, the equivalent would be writing a letter to the mayor asking them to make and hang “pulley nooses.”
 
theres something nefarious about all this. i think your being setup to fail.
It's pretty logical from a historical perspective. Check out what led to the Watts riots and the aftermath. President Johnson and MLK had a really interesting discussion about them, I highly recommend checking it out.

Stuff like this isn't particularly new. The Civil Rights Movement was met with pretty much the exact same opposition. Plus it's really a combination of a bunch of different groups and in a lot of ways an evolution of the Occupy movement. Plus I've said before there is a massive disconnect and feeling of hopelessness with the younger generations. Millenials have lived through two economic collapses and the cost of living continues to rise while wages haven't.

That's why you're probably wondering why there's so many different elements involved, it's a decentralized movement that while being national in the amount of protests, the protests themselves are still generally ran at a local level and even then there are maybe five to ten groups in a city organizing different rallies and such. Personally I'm very very happy with what Colorado has done to address police reform.

It's also been handled horribly, Amnesty International just released their report and it's rather scathing. We've had no rioting and only minor clashes with the police because our local police has been rather attentive to the issues being raised. Places like NYC are going to be hit with massive lawsuits when the ACLU is done with them. They obviously weren't very happy when Legal Informers were exclusively targeted by the police for beatings and arrests. (the police were heard to tell "get the green hats")
 
well then, we will just have to see about that one amigo, I won’t be leaving, but you and your racist antifa friends will be in gulags soon enough.

Man it’s getting hard to keep up. Antifa is going to be in gulags? I thought the concern was they were going to be the ones setting up gulags for normal people that don’t do enough groveling to BLM etc.?
 
I have an honest couple of questions, to grasp your opinion on the subject so I may better understand your point of view.

1) Do you agree with the legislation Colorado is passing? You can find a quick overview of the changes here. The police seem to also be on the side of the changes.
https://www.cpr.org/2020/06/03/colorado-police-reform-bill-requires-body-cams-bans-chokeholds-and-moves-toward-more-transparency/#:~:text=June 2, 2020.,and reported to the public.

2) Do you think that there is a major issue with the way the police deals with mentally ill people? It's no secret that if you have a family member going through an episode or mental breakdown, calling the police more often than not leads to an escalation that can end either in the death of that family member, someone being hurt, or someone being imprisoned. I'll not even blame the LEOs on that point, they simply do not have the training and their training towards dealing with criminality absolutely does not help in those situations.
I'm going to link you to an ACLU article that I would very much like you to read as it honestly breaks down my opinions on the matter and why I'm taking part in the protests. That way we could have an honest discussion about both our concerns on this topic.

https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/defunding-the-police-will-actually-make-us-safer/
I'll quote what I find to be the most pressing of concerns.

1) I do not fully agree with the legislation Colorado is passing. Some of it is good, like body cameras, but quite a bit of it is bad, like ending qualified immunity. Being a police officer is an inherently dangerous job, and there are people with an irrational hatred of police who will use any leverage they can to harm police or to make them ineffective. I don't want criminals or those that are genuinely dangerous to have a free hand to harm innocent people. That is what you will get if you make it too difficult to be a police officer. They will not be able to act because they might end up in prison or sued out of existence for trying to do their job.

2) I'm very open to initiatives for better training and even policy changes that alter the rules of engagement. Like for example I support training in deescalation and grappling techniques so that cops have better options that let them control a situation before it spins out of control.

But do we want police to not act because they might be punished if things go sideways? Were you at all bothered by the cop who waited outside during the Parkland shooting? I will grant you he did so because he was a coward, but imagine if we create conditions for all cops to act that way?

I read the ACLU article and its leftist propaganda. Enforcing the law is bad apparently.
 
Doxing should fall under threats, cyberbullying, and incitement. It's our digital age lynch mobs and vigilanteism that only seems to be getting worse.


With that said, I don't get you "dox" a mayor. Is she not a public figure by the nature of her position?
 
imagine how much money we could save if the cops weren't spending half their time profiling and arresting people for drugs.
 
Back
Top