- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 72,775
- Reaction score
- 53,068
So when they asked him to show his hands, how could he have shown his hands in a way that wouldn't result in his death?
By not having anything in his hands.
I know it's a bit of shitty deal to expect perps and citizens to know exactly how to comply with some orders, and mistakes do get made. However, cops are given leeway when assessing threats like this, because the margin for error the other way(the guy is pulling/does have a gun) is so slim, and they have every authority not to take that chance. And they should continue to have that authority.
If you give a command that can only result in the death of an unarmed suspect, shouldn't you be at fault for giving poor commands?
This wasn't a case of poor commands, unlike that kid who got shot in the hotel in Vegas(?). Those were poor commands.
In this case, it was simply a case of them not being able to identify what was in his hands, and not taking any chances. It's pretty standard, and you can't blame the cops for a making a decision to shoot in the heat of the moment.