- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 560
- Reaction score
- 0
You had decent points and then i read your sig.....talk about idiotic and childish. Oh wait, you're a blue belt, i guess it's okay then.
You had decent points and then i read your sig.....talk about idiotic and childish. Oh wait, you're a blue belt, i guess it's okay then.
It's not always white belts....
Earlier today, or yesterday I made a comment about Anderson's next opponent; now most people know it's James. I read these threads and it's white belt after white belt after white belt.
there are people here whose posts i read, but i rarely check names/belts, etc, and quite often there are some great points. but most often it's not a white belt. in fact, whites are often making outlandish/retarded statements.
so i propose a fix, which i'm sure sherdog will never go for, but figured, why not.
either:
1) create another tier of posting, where you can't join unless you have posted X number of times. that won't in and of itself eliminate douchebaggery, but someone will have to work real hard, and take a lot of abuse to achieve the level.
or
2) do not allow white belt posts to appear on chat pages until they've reached X number of posts. meaning, they can read, write, then hit post, but it won't show up. an internal counter will eventually let them know if they've arrived. yes, it's redundant and painful, but if it's worth it you'll do it.
i think (1) is a better option, for many reasons but something has to be done to control the idiot children here.
there's a lot of great stuff getting lost in the shuffle on this board that it makes me want to take my own brand of average stuff elsewhere.
Originally Posted by bruiserbrody View Post
You had decent points and then i read your sig.....talk about idiotic and childish. Oh wait, you're a blue belt, i guess it's okay then.
Earlier today, or yesterday I made a comment about Anderson's next opponent; now most people know it's James. I read these threads and it's white belt after white belt after white belt.
there are people here whose posts i read, but i rarely check names/belts, etc, and quite often there are some great points. but most often it's not a white belt. in fact, whites are often making outlandish/retarded statements.
so i propose a fix, which i'm sure sherdog will never go for, but figured, why not.
either:
1) create another tier of posting, where you can't join unless you have posted X number of times. that won't in and of itself eliminate douchebaggery, but someone will have to work real hard, and take a lot of abuse to achieve the level.
or
2) do not allow white belt posts to appear on chat pages until they've reached X number of posts. meaning, they can read, write, then hit post, but it won't show up. an internal counter will eventually let them know if they've arrived. yes, it's redundant and painful, but if it's worth it you'll do it.
i think (1) is a better option, for many reasons but something has to be done to control the idiot children here.
there's a lot of great stuff getting lost in the shuffle on this board that it makes me want to take my own brand of average stuff elsewhere.
That makes me feel like you should be a blue belt. What are you saying, dude. Do we all need 'crafty' and 'intellectual' MMA quotes or talk on our sig? Sorry I must have forgotten the memo.
Bad argument. Like I'm sure we've all heard before arguing over the internet is like the Special Olympics. Debate if you can.
again. not disagreeing, but it'd be nice to find a way to reduce trollage.
Earlier today, or yesterday I made a comment about Anderson's next opponent; now most people know it's James. I read these threads and it's white belt after white belt after white belt.
there are people here whose posts i read, but i rarely check names/belts, etc, and quite often there are some great points. but most often it's not a white belt. in fact, whites are often making outlandish/retarded statements.
so i propose a fix, which i'm sure sherdog will never go for, but figured, why not.
either:
1) create another tier of posting, where you can't join unless you have posted X number of times. that won't in and of itself eliminate douchebaggery, but someone will have to work real hard, and take a lot of abuse to achieve the level.
or
2) do not allow white belt posts to appear on chat pages until they've reached X number of posts. meaning, they can read, write, then hit post, but it won't show up. an internal counter will eventually let them know if they've arrived. yes, it's redundant and painful, but if it's worth it you'll do it.
i think (1) is a better option, for many reasons but something has to be done to control the idiot children here.
there's a lot of great stuff getting lost in the shuffle on this board that it makes me want to take my own brand of average stuff elsewhere.
Exactly and I've been here longer than a lot of higher belts. Just because I don't post (because these forums rarely have intelligent discussions) as much as you doesn't mean I don't know my MMA. I've been a fan since the first UFC and probably know a lot more about the sport than you do.,,
I hate whitebelts. Everytime you see a stupid fucking post about tuffers being goats, KJ noons being the best LHW or just pure Crocop, Fedor etc bashing its always a fucking whitebelt with a join date that dosent go past 2 months.
On top of that every dam Time a UFC event is on you get tons of new whitebelts joining the community right after the event making shitty threads and preaching like they've been watching MMA forever.
Last but not least I hate how they think everything outside the UFC is overrated and like how Dana white portrayes himself bigger than the fighters of the org. They cheer for idiots like Kimbo and Attention whores like tito over classy guys like Nog, Machida and Fedor. They are not very open minded at all.
Yes they should be able to post but not making threads. Its 95% troll jobs anyway.
Only thing worse than whitebelts are postwhores. Yes you know who you are.
Reports about bad ads should include the following:
1. Location/Country
2. Device
3. Browser
4. Company/Product of ad
5. A screenshot if possible
6. Brief description of how the ad is a problem
7. Page/Pages affected8. Date and time of occurrence
Refer to the instructions for your device on how to take screenshots