- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 8,526
- Reaction score
- 8,378
in a panic shoots
Have you?Don’t believe what? Did you watch the videos?
in a panic shoots
Have you?Don’t believe what? Did you watch the videos?
I don't believe that's the reason he shot the others, because it isn't true. He shot them because they were assaulting him and had cornered him trying to disarm him. Firing a gun in close proximity to him, hitting him with a skateboard, lunging for his gun etc.Don’t believe what? Did you watch the videos?
Have you?
Toss in "vigilante".The arguments I run into against Kyle are so fucking stupid.
"He shouldn't have been there!" - so a child rapist that just got out of a mental hospital should have been there? *crickets*
"He brought a gun to a protest!" - ya, and so did countless others, including bicep boy. Only difference is Kyle was in legal possession - oh, and that wasn't a protest it was a full blown riot.
"STATE LINES!" - ......
?Are you guys slow or just too many paint chips as a kid ?
I’m not defending those people. But that idiot doing that to him made things way worse. Then he just runs away.I don't believe that's the reason he shot the others, because it isn't true. He shot them because they were assaulting him and had cornered him trying to disarm him. Firing a gun in close proximity to him, hitting him with a skateboard, lunging for his gun etc.
If things were different they would be different? I see a lot of people lately dismissing felons owning a gun as if that wasn't a felony. It is though, whether or not I agree with it. I don't believe drug possession should be a felony either, but that doesn't magically change the law.I don't disagree with the verdict or that it was self defense. However, if Rittenhouse had been a felon in possession of a firearm they would've locked him up & thrown away the key.
They found a way out & the prosecution played its part.
Ok I can agree with that. It's just that what you said in your original post wasn't true.I’m not defending those people. But that idiot doing that to him made things way worse. Then he just runs away.
However, if Rittenhouse had been a felon in possession of a firearm they would've locked him up & thrown away the key.
Gotta love all the "oh yeah, well if...." posts.If things were different they would be different? I see a lot of people lately dismissing felons owning a gun as if that wasn't a felony. It is though, whether or not I agree with it. I don't believe drug possession should be a felony either, but that doesn't magically change the law.
Ya. This dude tried stomping him, like I said earlier. Are you guys slow or just too many paint chips as a kid ?
spiteful, sadistic angle from the left is just getting started
god these people are monsters
yeah and if he had been hitler, he would have been hitler.only he wasn't.However, if Rittenhouse had been a felon in possession of a firearm they would've locked him up & thrown away the key.
No, he would have been convicted of the weapons charge, but not for murder. There is a thread on the first page right now about a convicted felon who was acquitted on his murder charge due to self defense, but was convicted of being a felon in possession on a gun. He'll likely get some jail time due to now being a multiple time felon, but it's a few years, not "throw away the key".I don't disagree with the verdict or that it was self defense. However, if Rittenhouse had been a felon in possession of a firearm they would've locked him up & thrown away the key.
They found a way out & the prosecution played its part.
Good catch. Its a low resolution image but I think I might have detected tig ol bitties as wellThese two on the far left and right must be a couple. He lets her dress him and in return she puts out.
I don't think so. He waited til the very last moment 2x that night to shoot.
Rosenbaum's past as a child molester was wholly irrelevant to the Rittenhouse case.