- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 9,909
- Reaction score
- 10,311
A few more points on the feint theory:
-Kiev was always gonna need to be defended. It's the capital, and it's within striking distance of the Northern border. Moving troops from Kiev to the fighting in the east is somewhere near a 270 mile trip. If those troops up and left to join the fight in the Donbas, well you'd have plenty of time to see them coming, intercept them, or just strike south into the capital once they left.
-To that effect, you just need like one BTG sitting on the border to freeze those assets (which the Ukrainians wouldn't move anyway, as they aren't retarded). And if the Russians need to push south, you could either blitz fast, If the UK's had left, or you make a slow coordinated push and actually take the surrounding towns and villages. You don't bypass them just to get stuck and watch your supply lines get cut.
-What you don't do is just drop a bunch of your "best" airborne troops in the middle of it all without the supplies to actually hold their objectives unless support can reach them. That alone should show you the intent. Those brigades (or whatever the fuck the russians call them) don't get dropped with just a single mortar company and hardly any food, if you goal is to have them play a long term holding operation for the north of Kiev. I know the russians are dumb, but they aren't that fucking dumb. What they clearly anticipated was a quick strike and to have those follow up units swinging s.w. to reinforce/relieve them. It failed, for all the reasons we've seen their slow ass armor fail in every region.
-Because you know what would have been a hell of a lot better of a use for those airborne units than the worlds shittiest feint? It would have been to integrate them with the armor in the East. You know, that armor that had no supporting infantry to actually screen their advances? So they just wandered into towns in close formation, seemingly oblivious to the small tactical teams blasting them to fuck with modern guided munitions. A decent infantry could have scouted those positions first; pointed out where the Ukrainians were, and found better routes besides strolling right through pre-arranged artillery brackets. Or they could have at least joined the fighting and flushed out the outnumbered defenders and defended their armored assets.
Seriously, nothing about a feint makes any sense whatsoever.
-Kiev was always gonna need to be defended. It's the capital, and it's within striking distance of the Northern border. Moving troops from Kiev to the fighting in the east is somewhere near a 270 mile trip. If those troops up and left to join the fight in the Donbas, well you'd have plenty of time to see them coming, intercept them, or just strike south into the capital once they left.
-To that effect, you just need like one BTG sitting on the border to freeze those assets (which the Ukrainians wouldn't move anyway, as they aren't retarded). And if the Russians need to push south, you could either blitz fast, If the UK's had left, or you make a slow coordinated push and actually take the surrounding towns and villages. You don't bypass them just to get stuck and watch your supply lines get cut.
-What you don't do is just drop a bunch of your "best" airborne troops in the middle of it all without the supplies to actually hold their objectives unless support can reach them. That alone should show you the intent. Those brigades (or whatever the fuck the russians call them) don't get dropped with just a single mortar company and hardly any food, if you goal is to have them play a long term holding operation for the north of Kiev. I know the russians are dumb, but they aren't that fucking dumb. What they clearly anticipated was a quick strike and to have those follow up units swinging s.w. to reinforce/relieve them. It failed, for all the reasons we've seen their slow ass armor fail in every region.
-Because you know what would have been a hell of a lot better of a use for those airborne units than the worlds shittiest feint? It would have been to integrate them with the armor in the East. You know, that armor that had no supporting infantry to actually screen their advances? So they just wandered into towns in close formation, seemingly oblivious to the small tactical teams blasting them to fuck with modern guided munitions. A decent infantry could have scouted those positions first; pointed out where the Ukrainians were, and found better routes besides strolling right through pre-arranged artillery brackets. Or they could have at least joined the fighting and flushed out the outnumbered defenders and defended their armored assets.
Seriously, nothing about a feint makes any sense whatsoever.