When you use caps to highlight things, you're acting out like a passive aggressive teenage girl.
Not everyone has said both were in the wrong, you continually slightly move the goal post and accuse me of things I've never said like making out like everyone here is on that same position. I've explained what the argument is repeatedly and you're convinced somehow going to squirm your way into being "right" the main point of contention with the argument in this thread is whether Sean deserves it, is it acceptable in return, many people have said if he's willing to give shit he has to take it. Ergo; not everyone has said Sean and DDP is in the wrong and your cuckrice buddy made a basic equivocation without any weight that both were deferentially bad, but child abuse was actually acceptable, given the circumstance, as have many others. Have you been reading this thread O'Lord of reading comprehension?
Setting up a bad faith situation, loading or framing my position as "hypothetically" racist, then asking if I was a christian conservative and think you are acting in good faith and are being intellectually honest. Fucking hilarious. None of the arguments I've made were on whether something was morally good, just that both are objectively bad and you can't accept the other as good/acceptable in response to the other, that wasn't the logic I used, it was your halfwit attempt at framing a hypothetical analogy, that wasn't even relevant, from that alone you are being disingenuous and it's flawed.
You certainly have learned a lot about people who supposedly argue as "I" do, since you actually do it yourself and have the self reflection and critical thinking skills of a house brick, you can't even recognize it.
I do hope you have an extensive background in martial arts as a punching bag so you can always fall back on CTE as an excuse.
