- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Messages
- 2,502
- Reaction score
- 5,269
Democrats legislated Jim crow.
Conservatives legislated Jim crow. Lmao @ trying to hide behind party labels you dishonest hack
Democrats legislated Jim crow.
Source?Conservatives legislated Jim crow. Lmao @ trying to hide behind party labels you dishonest hack
Are you trying to argue that politicians elected in rural southern US were liberals? And what, you think conservatives were the ones living and ruling in dense northern cities? Why do you people play stupid about the southern strategy and the dem/repub flip?? You're not stupid. You're just a dishonest bad-faith actor.Source?
I was thinking the same thing. I was more upset with Folx than anything else in the announcement.I’m more concerned with the use of “folx”. I just read that it’s folks but more inclusive but I wasn’t aware of any negative connotations to “folks”
Are you trying to argue that politicians elected in rural southern US were liberals? And what, you think conservatives were the ones living and ruling in dense northern cities? Why do you people play stupid about the southern strategy and the dem/repub flip?? You're not stupid. You're just a dishonest bad-faith actor.
Lets all revise history because we don't want to admit that your a pawn to the party of segregation and the Klan.....Are you trying to argue that politicians elected in rural southern US were liberals? And what, you think conservatives were the ones living and ruling in dense northern cities? Why do you people play stupid about the southern strategy and the dem/repub flip?? You're not stupid. You're just a dishonest bad-faith actor.
- 24hrs of open rec time for all - unchanged.
- 2hrs of open rec time for trans/non-binary
- 2hrs of open rec time for black people
No open rec time removed to crate the new slots, so there is no compromised pool time for everyone else.
Weird to talk about segregated pools if you're American considering how many public pools were shut down the second black people were allowed to swim in them, and now they're literally gatekept in fenced-in communities complete with pool Karens keeping watch.
Imagine posting like that and people taking him seriously queen B has evolved his gameCommunity pools that only people from that community can use?! The horror!
It’s just like LatinX. No one asked for it. No one wants it. But it’s trendy.I’m more concerned with the use of “folx”. I just read that it’s folks but more inclusive but I wasn’t aware of any negative connotations to “folks”
Now do white people.
When is white people rec time, since we're separating by race and that's cool? They have one, right?
And if they don't, you'd support creating one, correct?
Also, is this lady like one of those pool Karens you speak of?
LOL that's literally what you're doing hahahahahaha. How fucking dishonest can you get? Yeah man, totally, all those conservative Republicans living in New York and Boston! Just like it is today! While the liberal democrats lived in rural Georgia and Virginia! That's definitely how it was!Lets all revise history because we don't want to admit that your a pawn to the party of segregation and the Klan.....
Yeah man, liberals and conservatives definitely did not flip parties. That's why the Democrats of today are fighting to keep the confederate loser flag! Oh wait....That's what I thought.
HUSL Library: A Brief History of Civil Rights in the United States: Jim Crow Era
This guide focuses on the civil rights that various groups have fought for within the United States.library.law.howard.edu
Can you find me a word that isn’t made up?Folx is a made-up word that has its origins in queer Theory. It thus appears from activists within Critical Social Justice but usually only within queer contexts, including queer Theoretical scholarship (see also, trans-rights activism). It is clearly a derivation of the word “folks,” which has its own specialized usage and interesting etymology within Critical Social Justice circles (readers are strongly encouraged to see also, folks).
Part of the purpose for the development of the term “folks” within the queer Theory context is to avoid using gendered language to address a crowd, say with phrases like “hey guys” (putatively gender-neutral use of “guys”) or “ladies and gentlemen” (which upholds the sex and/or gender binaries and is therefore exclusive of transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming identities – see also, inclusion). “Folks” is therefore offered as a comfortable gender-neutral alternative.
Queer Theory is rarely content with such applications in and of themselves because they are insufficiently disruptive of normativities or may, in fact, end up somehow supporting or maintaining them. Of concern with the term “folks,” for example, is that its translation in some languages is gendered, such as “la gente” in Spanish, which is gendered feminine (see also, phallogocentrism, Derrdiean, and deconstruction). The term “folks” is also used in many different context and thus does not clearly signal one’s queer politics. These are both significant problematics that need to be addressed by queering the language, specifically here through the creation of intentionally political and inherently anti-gendered terms like “folx” (see also, womxn and Latinx). Such a creation solves both problems at once because “folx” is not a word—thus not gendered—in any language, including Esperanto, and thus is only used by people who wish to signify adherence to queer politics.
It’s almost impossible not to see this alternative spelling as both unnecessary and insane. Indeed, it is both. As can be read in the example provided below, one of the reasons that “folks” is not considered gender–inclusive enough is because the wrong kinds of activists (feminists – namely “trans-exclusionary radical feminists”) have started using “folks” in keeping with standard Critical Social Justice usage, so the right kinds of activists need an alternative term that distinguishes them from the more problematic activists (see also, non-consensual co-platforming). Apparently, although the use of the word “folks” in Critical Social Justice is profoundly influenced by origins in black feminist and critical race Theory thought, queer Theorists (who are the centers of their own worlds) seem unaware of this longer, deeper etymology. In a show of “true” solidarity, then, they have graciously extended the use of the word “folx” to people of color, possibly presumably because the word “folks” is commonly used by (white supremacist, racist, culturally racist, anti-black) white conservatives.
Laughing...whatever makes you feel better for being a pawn to the party of segregation both then and now.LOL that's literally what you're doing hahahahahaha. How fucking dishonest can you get? Yeah man, totally, all those conservative Republicans living in New York and Boston! Just like it is today! While the liberal democrats lived in rural Georgia and Virginia! That's definitely how it was!