- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 18,024
- Reaction score
- 93
It's cause I'm jonesing.You should feel bad for making this hackneyed post.
It's cause I'm jonesing.You should feel bad for making this hackneyed post.
split decisions shouldn't exist, they should be draws.
I don't know what any of this means.
And for every conflicting round between the cards, they should ask why the fuck they weren't scored 10-10's.
You have in no way whatsoever described how this is a bad idea. You should feel bad for posting a non counter argument. You also misspelled 'ridiculous'.This is a stupid idea for many reasons.
#1 there are often rediclious split decisions where one judge is completely out to lunch from every other score card and you’re now extending the fight.
#2 Basically you could end up having unlimited rounds to get away with a split. For example if MM vs Henry if MM wins round 6 on 2/3 judges score cards the cards could have ended up being 57-55, 56-56, 55-57 which ensure that at least 3 more rounds are required to reach an unanimous decision.
Basically this idea is bad and you should feel bad.