* Stitch fired by UFC *

This is America where merits and work ethic matter more than "bloodlines" or inheritance wealth. You go ahead and vote for Hillary, no big deal, but don't blame me when this modern day Greece on Steroids gets an erectal disfunction. Now that being said, guys, let's get back on topic and discuss the topic at hand which is a man firing another man in this country.

Statistics show very clearly that in the socialist Nordic countries social mobility is much higher than in the US, as are standards of living. So if you want a system where merits and work ethic matters, then vote for Sanders.

btw. 80% of wealth in the United States is based on inheritance.
 
The only kits I'd buy would be Burt's and Stitchs'. Fuck you Dana White.
 
all of this for only 60million dollars. u guys still think dana is a good businessman? I think tito was right about him from the start.
 
Stitch didn't even really say anything bad. Just that he wasn't making as much money. Firing him for that is beyond another level of filth for this company.
 
The UFC can do whatever they want TS. But the fact remains that most people find it shitty and for obvious reasons.

And imo, the Reebok deal is shitty to the fighters and some staff (see Stitch). That God I live somewhere that I'm allowed to voice that opinion
 
Is it the guy faking to smoke a joint behind?

Hell No, Wild Bill Hagey just cleaned up a little and started following MMA instead of Baseball when they wouldn't let him toke in yuppie Camden Yards.

He added class to the seventh inning stretch and gave an infamous new meaning to John Denver's line in "Thank God I'm a Country Boy" (Got Me a Pipe!:icon_chee)
 
while i agree with some of TS's arguments, this Stitch issue is less of a business matter and more of a PR matter. in this respect, yes, the UFC screwed up.

Nobody outright DENIES THE RIGHT of the company to fire said employee (if that is the case, the person is childish) but, as a versed company, the UFC should have smelled the coffee and realized that a firing of a popular mma figure goes beyond the ceasing of a contractual arrangement between two parties, especially when it comes at a time of rising customer dissatisfaction towards the company (uniforms, loss of sponsors, fighter pay, etc). there are externalities to such a decision and i suspect the decision was a emotional one, probably made by Dana or someone high up the food chain in Zuffa.

that is my only problem with the situation - they handled it poorly and continue to do so.
 
Statistics show very clearly that in the socialist Nordic countries social mobility is much higher than in the US, as are standards of living. So if you want a system where merits and work ethic matters, then vote for Sanders.

btw. 80% of wealth in the United States is based on inheritance.

There are absolutely some things, bro, where I agree that socialised system works well. In fact, I think everyone, and I say everyone needs to have access to education and healthcare. No question about it whatsoever. Second thing is, infrastructure investment NEED to increased dramatically. There's a lot of things I could talk about here but what I'm saying here is that we need to get rid of laws giving out privileges, we need to increase freedoms, and we need to create a smaller government overall.
 
So ever since Uncle Dana fired the cutman known as "Stitch" and told him outright that his services would no longer be required, a lot of White Knights come out of the woodwork here on Sherdog forums making these bold statements: "You're a jackass if you support the UFC and Reebok, man!" "ALL the fighters know Stitch didn't deserve to get fired!" Now that, in and of itself, is not a big deal, guys, we see those kind of reactions all the time here. Moreover, it's a free country, guys. Now what concerns me though is that when I browse through these forums, man, I see a lot of confused people. People who ain't got their priorities in order! What concerns me even more, as a libertarian, is that we've got a bunch of lightweight libertarians here, you know the "Bitcoin, piracy, japanase cartoon, pro wrestling, "I don't give a fuck" tough guy crowd, who don't understand what it means to be a responsible libertarian in the modern world. What it means to be a man, guys. Now that being said, I feel compelled to dispel a couple of misconceptions about this whole ordeal.

Firstly, let me just say this. As a man Dana White has all the moral right in the world to fire anyone, anytime, for whatever reason he sees fit. He's the President, guys. Now for whatever reason, this country has established "laws" preventing someone to fire another person's ass because they happen to be a woman, a mexican, a muslim, handicapped, gay, you name it guys! And don't get me wrong, and don't misquote me like the media did with Candidate Trump, guys, because I LOVE everybody. That being said, just like a man has the RIGHT to choose who he works for, a man has the RIGHT to choose who works under him. Just facts, guys, let's not get emotional over this, okay?

Second thing is this whole Reebok conspiracy angle, and I'm not gonna even comment on this childish new world oder stuff I've seen posted all around these forums. That's just mind blowingly simplistic thinking, guys. Whoever think there a conspiracy here is a baby in the world of business. Now what's a more interesting argument flying around here is the fact that a lot of Sherdoggers like to post Tweets and other cute stuff showing how "all the fighters are supporting Stitch, the victim, dude!" First of all, bro, Stitch is not a victim because it's how the free market works in the REAL world. Secondly, guys, let's not be naive here, okay? I mean these are fighters we're talking about here. Prize fighters! And you expect them to weight in, in a nuanced and balanced way in complicated issues like these? Guys, let's not be babies, these are not doctors, these are not MBAs, and these are not Scientists we're talking about here.

Let me just finish by making it clear right now that there's NOT going to be any grand boycott. There's not gonna be any dent in the numbers of the UFC. Moreover, there wasn't any injustice done. This is free market guys. Stitch will most likely find a new job and be fine with it. Just because he's a mexican and gets fired by Uncle Dana doesn't mean it's any different, morally speaking, to all the downsizings going on throughout the world as we speak, man! It's the free market. Deal with it.

lmao @ freemarket.

i love supposed capitalists who don't know the first thing about it. Go read some Adam Smith and then be very embarrassed for yourself.
 
while i agree with some of TS's arguments, this Stitch issue is less of a business matter and more of a PR matter. in this respect, yes, the UFC screwed up.

Nobody outright DENIES THE RIGHT of the company to fire said employee (if that is the case, the person is childish) but, as a versed company, the UFC should have smelled the coffee and realized that a firing of a popular mma figure goes beyond the ceasing of a contractual arrangement between two parties, especially when it comes at a time of rising customer dissatisfaction towards the company (uniforms, loss of sponsors, fighter pay, etc). there are externalities to such a decision and i suspect the decision was a emotional one, probably made by Dana or someone high up the food chain in Zuffa.

that is my only problem with the situation - they handled it poorly and continue to do so.

The problem is that in this country there are a set of reasons where it is ILLEGAL to fire an employee. Yes, it's a silly law no question about it whatsoever, my man.
 
Back
Top