Okay so I'm supposed to conclude that a media-trained, wealthy donor-funded guy (meaning lots of resources) who most often targets young people who havent even completed their education getting better of them in debates is indicative that the problem is Colleges? There's a reason he, Walsh, Crowder, all those guys specifically targeted these audiences and often only engage at their own events where they have crowd support and control (they can and often do elect to move on from a point when they're getting tooled by suggesting it's someone else's turn to speak).
There is an attack on critical thinking, it's coming in the form of book bans and threats to curriculum at the grade school level.
