I did not.
Which market will produce better products for a consumer? The market with one firm that has no incentive to produce a better product, or a market with multiple firms pressuring each other to fight for consumers with better products? I don't know why mma fans tend to think the sport is somehow the sole exception to economics.
Somewhat true. I'll just point out that again, it's not either the boxing model or the UFC model., You can take what works from each, assuming there is enough competence. But that's another discussion.
That's not really the case. Being a good boxer is not the same as being a good coach. In athletics, those who are the best tend to not be the most knowledgeable or the best teachers because they are such good athletes they can take shortcuts.
You mean before the Fertitas used their influence on the athletic commission to sabotage SEG and purchase the UFC at a fire sale price? Or are we talking about that time the Fertitas got sued for using Xyience in a shady manner?