I'm just having fun. I preferred the pre-USADA era.The fans won't care. The networks won't care. So why should the UFC? There isn't even any evidence that USADA benefited the athletes anyway
Damn, they flat out said ufc wanted Conor to bypass usada protocol so badly that, when refused, the ufc just said "well, fuck usada then, we'll stop working with you"
This week has given us so much news pointing to just how much of a bush league the ufc is.
No. Now he's gonna need more time to cycle back into it.So Conor is fighting right around January then?
it's old news though. it's like what i said in the Mark Hunt vs UFC thread. everyone focused on how dumb Mark Hunt and salty he is instead of looking at just how perfectly "coincidental" everything had to be in order for that fight to go through on UFC's big night of UFC 200. it's why i don't understand why more people didn't see it that way. like they talked about Mark Hunt but the most interesting thing about that entire thing was just how perfect everything was for the UFC to plead ignorance and for USADA to still do their job yet have it effectively nulled by the timing of the testing.
if you totally erase Mark Hunt from the situation, what actually happened looks so fucking sus.
This forum is full of children who can't conceptualize past the idea that if some people can get past a hurdle, then it isn't a hurdle. That is their world. Unless USADA was stopping every athlete, then it wasn't stopping any athletes.Looking at fighters in their late 30s or 40s becoming jacked AF within a year of leaving the UFC, I think it shows USADA is doing at least something.
"It's not cheating if you change the rules"Conor juiced up cheat expected