Variety: ESPN, Fox Sports Team Up for UFC TV-Rights Bid

@DataBreach
I just re-read this:
So now the UFC wants a deal with fewer PPV's (they have no choice at this point, no one is buying anyway) but with a streaming service ESPN+ that will cost the viewers more money.

I think you are confusing the offered deal.
They will be on Fox & ESPN plus be on ESPN+
ESPN+ would be similar to what they do now with FP
 
I understand 100% that MMA interest (UFC being the biggest) is down.
Again, I never argued that. All I did was explain that due to different business plans by the current owners, they don't need to grow the interest more to make more $$$ & get the investment back.

In 2014, nobody saw the 2015-2017 profits coming their way.
But they did.

The point is, if UFC can make $200-300m profit now, they can kill it in a decent year.

A good business plan adapts to the times. You can't compare 2006 to 2018 as far as business plans/management.

WME & the investors did not buy UFC to further MMA. They did it because WME saw ways to make even more money yearly than Lorenzo did.
That is/was their goal.

Is that good for MMA fans?
I doubt it, but I am holding off until 2020 when we live through a year of the new era's distribution deals.
Eventually, if the UFC has no fans is that going to have an impact on profits? LOL.

If the UFC keeps making decisions that make it hard to be a fan they'll have none left.
 
@DataBreach
I just re-read this:


I think you are confusing the offered deal.
They will be on Fox & ESPN plus be on ESPN+
ESPN+ would be similar to what they do now with FP
How many FP cards were there in 2017?

This deal will have 15 on ESPN+ no?
 
I am not paying leftist ESPN for UFC content. A shame, I am happy with the PPV/Fox/FS1 tiered system, with the lower and mid tier free, and really weak fights on FightPass that I do not watch anyway.
 
Not paying extra for a streaming service. I hope this deal falls through.

if all of the FP stuff is given out for $5 a month as opposed to $10 that I pay now, I'll take it.

I like FP, the few extra fights per card + just being able to go back and view a lot of that old fight library is worth it
 
Put it where ever you like ufc I'll stream it from the same site I always do.
 
Remember those days ESPN didn't consider the UFC/MMA a legitimate sport? Boy has the time change.
 
As I mentioned in March, UFC could not get more then $250m from Fox so they were looking to split up programming between two networks
-

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/espn-fox-sports-ufc-bid-1202755660/

Rivals ESPN and Fox Sports have teamed up to bid for television rights for Ultimate Fighting Championship.

Variety has learned that the two companies have recently proposed to split the UFC TV package in a move that would bring as many as 15 fight events to new subscription streaming service ESPN+.

According to sources with knowledge of the proposal, ESPN has signaled that it would be willing to pay $120-180 million per year to add the Endeavor-owned mixed martial arts league to its collection of live-event rights.

Fox, which currently pays $120 million per year UFC rights, would be willing see that number increase to a little more than $200 million. Fox’s current package includes four Saturday-night fights per year on Fox Broadcasting and a number of fight events on cabler Fox Sports 1 that has increased annually under its current agreement. A joint bid with ESPN would see Fox’s total number of events decline slightly.

Representative for ESPN, Fox Sports, and Endeavor declined to comment.

For ESPN, a UFC deal would provide premium live-event content for the fledgling ESPN+ service not currently available on the company’s linear cable channels. ESPN+ launched last week at $4.99 per month with a mix of content including select games from MLB, NHL and out-of-market MLS games. UFC could mark the first significant deal for Kevin Mayer, who was recently promoted to run a direct-to-consumer unit at ESPN parent company Disney, and the network’s new president, James Pitaro.

Endeavor has reportedly sought $300-$400 million per year in a new television package. The agency acquired UFC in 2016 for roughly $4 billion with private equity firms Silver Lake Partners and KKR — part of an aggressive push into original sports content. While still known as WME, Endeavor bought sports agency IMG in 2013 for $2.3 billion and bought Professional Bull Riders in 2015 for a reported $100 million.

But potential network partners have balked at the high asking price to televise UFC, which also distributes fight events through its own pay-per-view and OTT platforms. UFC has suffered significant ratings declines in recent years. In 2017, Fox’s Saturday-night broadcasts fell 22% in average total viewers from the previous year at just under 2 million. “UFC Fight Night” on FS1 averaged 795,000 viewers, down 17%.

Fox signed a seven-year television deal with UFC in 2011, and late last year put in a roughly $200 million bid to secure those rights — far lower than the Endeavor asking price. A joint deal with ESPN would keep Fox in business with UFC at a time of transition for the company, which is in the process of selling the bulk of its entertainment divisions to Disney.

An exclusive negotiation period between UFC and Fox expired late last year; the MMA league has explored options from handing over the rights to a traditional network like Fox or one of the growing number of tech giants who have displayed an increased appetite for sports rights over the past 12 months. Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel has also considered holding onto the rights and distributing over the league’s own streaming service, a possibility that received renewed speculation last month when Endeavor spent $250 million to acquire streaming provider NeuLion.

While Fox and Disney have fought each other in years past to secure various U.S. TV sports packages, UFC would not mark the first league to which these rivals have shared rights. Both companies currently split rights to several leagues including Big Ten Conference, MLS and Pac 12 football.

A post-acquisition 21st Century Fox would consist of a slimmed-down Fox Sports, Fox News, and a Fox Broadcasting uncoupled from its lucrative television studio counterpart. The company, referred to as New Fox internally, is expected to be driven primarily by sports and news programming.


-

If that is the offer, I'd be shocked if they did not take it

But I been out of the loop due to a hospitalization
Hope your health is ok. Thank you for the solid info sir
 
I hope the deal doesn't go through because of the streaming service part. I want everything on fightpass.
 
I hope the deal doesn't go through because of the streaming service part. I want everything on fightpass.

That will never happen
They need TV for exposure & PPV for big money events
 
That will never happen
They need TV for exposure & PPV for big money events
What I meant is that I want all the events that UFC wants to stream, on UFC.tv, not split with that and ESPN+.
 
What I meant is I want all the events that UFC wants to stream, on UFC.tv, not split with that and ESPN+.

Gotcha
But I doubt it would be split.
I would guess that FP would be absorbed by ESPN+
Similar to Amazon wanting FP

Edit: or FP just being for archives
 
Gotcha
But I doubt it would be split.
I would guess that FP would be absorbed by ESPN+
Similar to Amazon wanting FP
So in your mind fightpass on UFC.tv, with all the events, fightographies, ultimate fighters, press conferences etc. would go away, but all that content would be absorbed by ESPN and presented in a new way on ESPN+?
 
You seem to be getting worked up about something we have no idea will happen.

Online outrage culture. A whole generation with their jimmies permanently set to rustled :D

Hope you're feeling better Frankie :)
 
So in your mind fightpass on UFC.tv, with all the events, fightographies, ultimate fighters, press conferences etc. would go away, but all that content would be absorbed by ESPN and presented in a new way on ESPN+?

The live stuff? I definitely see,
I did an edit regarding catalogue.

But when I broke the Amazon news/interest, they were supposedly going to put the catalogue on Prime, but add the live cards as an additional purchase.

If UFC were willing to do that with Amazon, I can see it with ESPN.

I'm guessing the $120-180 difference in yearly price (as per article) is due to a difference in deal structure
 
@Danespina
UFC currently grosses about $50m a year from FP
So the $60m difference seems in the ballpark
 
Back
Top