- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 133,762
- Reaction score
- 32,710
Why?There is precisely zero possibility Golovkin fights him.
Why?There is precisely zero possibility Golovkin fights him.
i think he gets the kovalev treatment, slowly fades now
Why?
lolwut??Because he's far too dangerous at this point in Golovkin's career. Even when he was at his peak, I still think he'd have avoided Charlo.
They dont get punished or lose their rankings, for example Linares, he’s one fight into 140 and if he fights and beats Broner he’s #1, pretty unfair but I would love to see Ramirez vs Linares
#wbcmandatory
lolwut??
HBO deal is done, GGG is a free agent essentially. If Charlo wants it, he can get it.
I don't think so. He's taken (somewhat) high risk/low reward fights in the past.What does this have to do with HBO? I'm saying that Golovkin will duck Charlo, especially at this point in his career.
I don't think so. He's taken (somewhat) high risk/low reward fights in the past.
Not like that superstar Vanes Martirosyan.GGG is never going to fight him (super high risk & low reward) Charlo has like 20 fans total (if that) he literally brings nothing to the table.
Jacobs.Who?
Jacobs.
Not like that superstar Vanes Martirosyan.
lolwut??
HBO deal is done, GGG is a free agent essentially. If Charlo wants it, he can get it.
Because team GGG asked WBC to force a trilogy , so if he wants Goatnelo he must become the mandatoryI'm not sure why Golovkin should have to fight Canelo's mandatory for him. That's suppose to be his responsibility now.
Lots of his fights have been high risk/low reward. What did he get out of fighting Wade? Or Monroe?You did say 'fights' (plural), though. But yes, that was a high risk/low reward fight I suppose. However I think that Golovkin HAD to take that fight to retain any legitimacy as world champion, especially as a P4P fighter. He'd fought so many cans prior to that, he really had no other option than to fight Jacobs.