- Joined
- Dec 21, 2022
- Messages
- 2,526
- Reaction score
- 7,438
Parents included!all your idols are also on something or other.
Parents included!all your idols are also on something or other.
“If he wins this fight, he’s the GOAT (insert weight class)”. So you going to rank the entire landscape of a division past, present and future over one fight. What a dumb thing to say or believe. Why not wait till the man finishes his career? People label a fighter GOAT is parroting while thinking it’s some kind of insights. Either that or it’s a quick hype job for a fight.
“I don’t see him winning because he hasn’t fought anybody”. This was a common Islam narrative before fighting Charles. Even people taking Volk because he’s beaten better fighters than Topuria. Of course the challenger will have the less impressive resume. And just because he hasn’t beat anyone doesn’t mean doesn’t have the skills to win. What’s worse is that their opinion is flipped 180 degrees after a fight. They go from “he’s going to lose” before the fight to “he’s going to be champion for a long time” after a fight.
Another one is when people qualify themselves so their opinions look unbiased, but it’s biased in disguise. We all read someone’s post at the beginning and know how it’s going to end. It’ll be like:
“I’m not a fan of _____ but” then proceeds to praise him.
Or
“I’m the biggest _____ fan but” then proceeds to bash him.
“He pushed the pace and poured on the pressure so he deserves the win”
for fighters who walk forward and get outstruck
“to be the champ you gotta beat the champ”
for close decisions that the champion shouldn’t have been given (gsp, jones)
When a fighter loses more rounds but had a bigger moment in one round people scream ROBBERY, even when they know it’s round by round scoring
and then they go on to say “the fight should be scored as a whole” not realising that everyone would fight differently if the rules were different
“he won by clinch control”
objectively has zero impact in the judging criteria and subjectively shouldn’t mean anything either
“fighters are getting worse”
no they’re not, they’re getting better, you’re just nostalgic
At very least some prescription stuff.Parents included!
gotta beat the man to be the man
I saw it happen after the garry neal fightI've never once seen anyone use the term "clinch control"....
To be fair, Peter Griffin is a tough motherfucker. Have you seen his fights with the big chicken?easily the most cringe is "any 200 plus pound man can knock out any other man". Usually the favorite of out of shape 240 pound guys that walk around like they're a fucking bear
what you think you look like
what you actually look like
Rogan's really hard to listen to nowadays, way to bias and seems to have trouble keeping up with the fights.I saw it happen after the garry neal fight
“garry was winning the striking but neal had the clinch control I think you go neal”.
plus i think rogan said something like that too
pencil neck twink detectedeasily the most cringe is "any 200 plus pound man can knock out any other man". Usually the favorite of out of shape 240 pound guys that walk around like they're a fucking bear
what you think you look like
what you actually look like
Because of the excuses or because of the incorrect grammar??"Would of", "should of".