- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,603
- Reaction score
- 2,675
I really am leaning more towards an Adirondack, light, compact, accurate as hell, reliable....
Sometimes it's tempting to just order up a NULA but I've never really got to play with one long term, just a few rounds at a range. So I'm not really so sure I'm getting much more than I'd get from a kimber.
I've seen you mention them a lot and have looked. It's like 2 oz lighter, probably more accurate(maybe couple-few tenths at 100), maybe slightly smoother action.
Honestly the Kimber would get my vote. I honestly really like the look of the entire rifle. Plus you could get a .30 cal Ascent and 6.5 Adirondack for almost the same price as the nula.