I watched this PV video in it's entirety, some information was worth knowing. Some information was presented without adequate context.
In the past, PV has presented recording of people's statements that were edited in a way that did not properly present the question being responded to. That always matters to me in videos. I want to know what was asked, not just what the answers were because knowing the flow of an exchange always me to put the responses into proper context.
It's actually strange to me. Right now, you're responding to me in the Brookings thread by saying that you won't even read the paper because it's a left leaning source but you're over here saying that we should accept an edited right-leaning video without question.
It's doubly strange to me. In this video, PV is exposing the actions of a man who uses video to manipulate by giving us an edited video that's intended to manipulate and you have little interest in making sure that they're not doing what they're accusing Dudich of doing. Healthy skepticism would say that if you believe that this NYT editor is engaged in these behaviors, that it's very possible that PV is as well. You should want reassurances.
