"I ripped the condom. Burn. I got you." -- gay man on HIV rampage taunted victims

[Cygnus A]

Not a crime in California

Pretty much unbelievable. What the fuck is wrong with that state?

 

[Rod1]

Seems like a bunch of you have had a meet up that I apparently didn't get an invite to...

I always wondered how much variation there is in the way we subjectively perceive color.

No matter how light skinned an asian is, ultimately it seems to me like melanin in certain regions is still heavily present (eyes, hair, and the fun parts).

 

[GOATER]

I always wondered how much variation there is in the way we subjectively perceive color.

No matter how light skinned an asian is, ultimately it seems to me like melanin in certain regions is still heavily present (eyes, hair, and the fun parts).

Im Mexican...My balls/dick are totally darker than my skin tone but I don't think that much...until that podcast, I just assume everybody is darker in the nutsack region, but idk.....Are people's dick/ballsack really the same color as their skin?

Next time ill analyze this when I watch porn.


BTW Im a regular Mestizo Mexican, so fiddy fiddy or 60/40 Euro/Native genetics.

 

[Trotsky]

This is not a joke:
http://www.latimes.com/politics/ess...ades-from-felony-to-1507331544-htmlstory.html

21st century Liberalism.

"Liberalism is a mental disease dur hurr"

The legislation you are daftly citing was actually just a leveling of the crime onto the same ground as all other knowing-exposure-of-disease criminal codes. It did not make it not a crime: it adjusted it to a level that was (a) empirically consistent with deterrence and addressing spread of the disease per the DOJ, and (b) consistent with other disease-spreading statutes for ailments like SARS and TB.

California’s felony HIV laws created a disincentive for some people to get tested, potentially doing more to increase rather than mitigate the public health risk of HIV.

Others in the group of more than 150 to support the bill included the California Medical Association, the district attorneys of San Francisco and Los Angeles, the California Women’s Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union of California.

Supporters pointed out that the knowing or intentional transmission of any other communicable disease in California, including some potentially deadly ones like SARS, Ebola and tuberculosis, is a misdemeanor crime.

“There’s no reason that HIV should be treated differently,” said Rick Zbur, executive director of Equality California, a LGBT civil rights nonprofit which was a co-sponsor of the bill. “A lot of what was behind this was basically looking at the laws to see how we could improve public health and modernizing these laws, so HIV is treated the same.”

In actuality, the code as it stood was just used to pass draconian sentences against prostitutes with a considerably lower burden of proof.

Of the 379 HIV-related convictions in California between 1988 and 2014, only seven — less than 2 percent — included the intent to transmit HIV, according to a recent series of studies from the UCLA School of Law’s Williams Institute.

Instead, the law mostly affected sex workers or those suspected of sex work. The vast majority of the convictions — 90 percent — were for solicitation cases where it was unknown whether any physical contact had occurred. When expanded to include the 800 or so people arrested or charged for the laws through 2014, more than 95 percent were related to sex work, the researchers found.

But don't let me get in the way of your fanning the reductive partisan flames. Your coalition with posters like James Russler, DevoutPessimist, and Patrick Carey is certainly one to blush at.

 

[Prime Rib]

Look, its fucked up....but why should the law get involved?


If a person chooses to have unprotected sex, deal with it....end of story.....Everybody knows the consequences....



I don't see how a person knowing they have HIV before fucking a willing person that agreed to unprotected sex, suddenly requires the law........but if somebody got HIV from unprotected sex and the infected didn't know before hand, its ok....No Law required in this situation tho, and everybody agrees, that person dun goof for having unprotected sex.



Now if a person thought they were having protected sex and the other guy took off the condom for example...then yes, the law should be involved....otherwise no.


Personal responsibility, ladies and gentlemen.

Everybody knows the consequences? That's not a good argument for allowing a person to knowingly expose another human to HIV.

You are on the wrong side on this one. Step away.

 

[2DUM2TAP]

Why would a man want to have sexual relations with another man?

That sounds gay

 

[PubliusVentidius]

Alignment: chaotic evil.

 

[Trotsky]

Why would a man want to have sexual relations with another man?

I pondered this question once, but then I asked myself additionally "why would a woman want to have sexual relations with a man," and I was equally grossed out and befuddled.

Eventually, I shrugged and turned my Queen record back on.

 

[GOATER]

Everybody knows the consequences? That's not a good argument for allowing a person to knowingly expose another human to HIV.

You are on the wrong side on this one. Step away.

It's a great argument.


Everybody who fucks without protection, knows its risky, very risky....Everybody....Now, yes condom sex is risky too, technically but the risk are massively different.


Regardless if the guy with HIV knew or not.....the actual act is exactly the same.....The law shouldn't get involved.

 

[D3thr0n3d K1ng]

You didn't answer my question.

How much money have you given Your Highness? We both know a big'0' because youre a selfish piece of zhit

SAD!!!

 

[salamander]

Not a crime in California

Not a crime in Ontario.

EDIT: Apologies for the fake news. They are reducing the threshold for someone to be charged for revealing you have HIV before having sex.

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...-prosecution-of-hiv-non-disclosure-cases.html

 

[Greoric]

How much money have you given Your Highness? We both know a big'0' because youre a selfish piece of zhit

Hah, if you only knew what I've given and what I'm still giving... You're the one who made the virtue signal. You wish society would just spend more money, was it? You're apart of society, so how much have you given? I wasn't the one who made that bullshit well wish. You did. So how about it?

And how classically socialist of you. You are indeed generous with other people's money aren't you parasite?

 

[j123]

Let him bang

 

[Black Helicopters]

I always wondered how much variation there is in the way we subjectively perceive color.

No matter how light skinned an asian is, ultimately it seems to me like melanin in certain regions is still heavily present (eyes, hair, and the fun parts).

Most Chinese diaspora are from southern China.

Northern Chinese are just as pale as any European

 

[Rod1]

Most Chinese diaspora are from southern China.

Northern Chinese are just as pale as any European

They still tan well, they still have dark eyes and hair.

Pinkness seems to be a trait almost exclusively of caucasians.

 

[Amerikuracana]

My gay work partner used to say "f*** em." They really don't care. Some real degeneracy there.

 

[Prime Rib]

It's a great argument.


Everybody who fucks without protection, knows its risky, very risky....Everybody....Now, yes condom sex is risky too, technically but the risk are massively different.


Regardless if the guy with HIV knew or not.....the actual act is exactly the same.....The law shouldn't get involved.

Would you lend your car to a person without telling them the brakes may malfunction because of a recall you haven't taken care of?

Sure, people die in car accidents all the time, but does that make it right to not disclose that information? Are you absolved of guilt?

 

[Devout Pessimist]

I pondered this question once, but then I asked myself additionally "why would a woman want to have sexual relations with a man," and I was equally grossed out and befuddled.

Eventually, I shrugged and turned my Queen record back on.

 

[Trotsky]

Hmm, so the location and nature of your prostate as well as the existence of numerous nerve endings near your rectum would dictate that you must automatically want people (girls or boys) sticking their fingers and genitalia in there.

So.....you do, huh?

 

[Devout Pessimist]

Can you explain where your attraction for women comes from? I don't mean evolutionary. I mean the impulse to stick your meat stick inside of a strange pink hole.

Vagina is for virgins. I prefer a woman's butthole.