Aside from Murder, The UK consistently had more crime than USA

MayhemMonkey said:
what facebook thread?

and no its no, theres just an uprising of racists. But the more they expose themselves the more people see them for what they are. Twats
Click to expand...
The one where twats are being thrown in UK jails for mean tweets. It's kind of a regression to medieval justice IMO.
 
MayhemMonkey said:
lol why do you guys focus on Khan like he is a powerful politician? he's a fucking mayor lol

You think Sadiq Khan is responsible for London being what it is today? if so you are delusional
Click to expand...
Khan is by far one of the most well known political figures not actually in your parliament, he is in charge of your biggest and most important city. He goes out of his way to be in front of the cameras and he is the most likely "low" level functionary that will almost assuredly look to transition into a Parliamentary career. He also involves himself with policies involving the EU, and the UK in general, outside of the scope of his duties as a "simple mayor".

Khan may not be specifically responsible for what London currently is, but he is very much responsible for how it has evolved since taking the position. It's his policies that have seen increased surveillance. Its his policies that have seen the police services of London focus more on speech than actual crimes. Khan is really no better than one of those Evergreen teachers being given control of a major metropolitan center much like Trudeau is pretty much one given control of a country.

It's completely disingenuous to label Khan as nothing more than a simple mayor and you know that. He very likely gets more press than 90% of his political peers and superiors.
 
Last edited:
RockstarChris said:
if you dont let your criminals murder each other then you will constantly have a yearly growth of criminals.

Criminal on Criminal murder is a type of population control.

Click to expand...

If it's a self-replenishing crop then maybe you can work out a plan to export your excess or maybe just an exchange of your criminal crop to diversify your crime?
 
Teppodama said:
If it's a self-replenishing crop then maybe you can work out a plan to export your excess or maybe just an exchange of your criminal crop to diversify your crime?
Click to expand...

Let states trade their criminals across state lines
 
MayhemMonkey said:
it says England and Wales..... which is not "the UK", its part of the UK.

So no, Im much safer in Scotland than in anywhere in America
Click to expand...
Of course Scotland would be, all those male pansies wear skirts
 
MayhemMonkey said:
lol why do you guys focus on Khan like he is a powerful politician? he's a fucking mayor lol

You think Sadiq Khan is responsible for London being what it is today? if so you are delusional
Click to expand...
Lool the picture they have of sadiq khab is hilarious. I bet you they cant name last 3 mayors in lindon. If he wasnt Muslim they wouldnt even know him
 
MicroBrew said:
Seems odd to compare a city with a nation.
Click to expand...
When a city's policies disseminate out to other lesser cities and serve as a template for other cities then
RockstarChris said:
Let states trade their criminals across state lines
Click to expand...
We need to look into taxing criminal activity. In the case of imported criminals, tariffs will need to be worked out. Whays your stance on GMO criminals or criminal byproducts? Are you strictly organic criminals despite potentially lower yields, higher costs and greater susceptibility to environmental factors?

Work out some deals with local Whole Crime locations for community sourced seasonal crime..
 
Stupid thread.

London(one of the biggest metro areas in the world) has a higher crime rate than a gigantic country with many many rural areas.

In other shocking news, places with alligators have more alligator attacks than places with no alligators. Amazing stuff.
 
ShadowRun said:
Of course Scotland would be, all those male pansies wear skirts
Click to expand...
those male pansies would fucking own you 1 on 1 mr "I need a gun for protection" :p

but wtf do America know about actual warriors?
 
Teppodama said:
Khan is by far one of the most well known political figures not actually in your parliament, he is in charge of your biggest and most important city. He goes out of his way to be in front of the cameras and he is the most likely "low" level functionary that will almost assuredly look to transition into a Parliamentary career. He also involves himself with policies involving the EU, and the UK in general, outside of the scope of his duties as a "simple mayor".

Khan may not be specifically responsible for what London currently is, but he is very much responsible for how it has evolved since taking the position. It's his policies that have seen increased surveillance. Its his policies that have seen the police services of London focus more on speech than actual crimes. Khan is really no better than one of those Evergreen teachers being given control of a major metropolitan center much like Trudeau is pretty much one given control of a country.

It's completely disingenuous to label Khan as nothing more than a simple mayor and you know that. He very likely gets more press than 90% of his political peers and superiors.
Click to expand...
"he is in charge" of what?
https://fullfact.org/news/what-can-mayor-london-actually-do/
educate yourself

the only reason he is in the news so much is because your fuckwit of a president and all his rabble of racist twat followers think there is a muslim invasion of Europe going on. You guys love to paint him as some big boogeyman that wields great power. He doesnt!
 
MayhemMonkey said:
those male pansies would fucking own you 1 on 1 mr "I need a gun for protection" :p

but wtf do America know about actual warriors?
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
Teppodama said:
Khan is by far one of the most well known political figures not actually in your parliament, he is in charge of your biggest and most important city. He goes out of his way to be in front of the cameras and he is the most likely "low" level functionary that will almost assuredly look to transition into a Parliamentary career. He also involves himself with policies involving the EU, and the UK in general, outside of the scope of his duties as a "simple mayor".

Khan may not be specifically responsible for what London currently is, but he is very much responsible for how it has evolved since taking the position. It's his policies that have seen increased surveillance. Its his policies that have seen the police services of London focus more on speech than actual crimes. Khan is really no better than one of those Evergreen teachers being given control of a major metropolitan center much like Trudeau is pretty much one given control of a country.

It's completely disingenuous to label Khan as nothing more than a simple mayor and you know that. He very likely gets more press than 90% of his political peers and superiors.
Click to expand...

Wtf are you talking about? Khan was an MP for over 10 years. He gets lots of press because that's the whole point of the mayor of London. They do PR and work on big projects that span multiple councils. Ken and Boris arguably got more press coverage than Khan did when they were Mayor, because those two were more charismatic and produced better soundbites.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,523
Messages
55,497,566
Members
174,796
Latest member
Fullmetalharts

Share this page

Back
Top