- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 47,489
- Reaction score
- 21,002
I don't think you're right here and, frankly, I think it's pretty naive to just think that the clergy attracts "sick fucks" to such a wildly disproportionate degree. For that level of prevalence, you'd almost have to think that young men in their teenage years or early adulthood were actively seeking out the clergy, which is not in itself a very glamorous life, for the access to children. And that just doesn't make sense, since they could do the same thing in other, less demanding occupations.
Yes, I think allowing these men to have sex lives would divert away much of their sexual malfeasance within the scope of their duties. All of it? Of course not. But I would expect at least a 50% reduction.
First, I never said that they were attracted to the clergy in a disproportionate degree. In my opinion, there are a handful of professions that attract these people in greater degrees than others. I have no data saying that the church is greater or lesser than the others. But they will get more scrutiny because of what they claim to stand for and for their history of protecting prior bad actors.
Additionally, there's sufficient data that says that victims of abuse frequently grow up to become abusers themselves. When you take that information coupled with the church's history of simply moving offenders to new parishes instead of kicking them out of the church altogether then you have a problem. Abusers creating victims and potential future abusers coupled with an environment that actually allows them to harm a greater number of kids across a broader spectrum of the country. Well, that will attract abusers.
And this particular sex crime is not something that people electively choose because they don't have the other option, it is intrinsic to them in some way. Allowing non-criminals to engage in non-criminal behavior is not going to change how the criminals think. Priests who want to have sexual relationships leave the church, they don't adopt deviant sexual acts as a substitute.
It's like asking "If we let the vegans eat meat, will the vegetarians stopping eating vegetables?"