Again, her claim (the very same one that was used to label her a "minority") was that she heard she had a distant NA ancestor. The test backs that up. I'm not reticent to acknowledge any facts; I'm just not *interpreting* facts in an unreasonable way to infer a claim that wasn't made and that was explicitly disavowed. It seems to me that you're just upset that I'm not putting words in her mouth (something you're normally quick to accuse others of doing, I should note).
Anyway, the thread is up. I think it is incredibly stupid and a rather obvious attempt to distract from issues. That is, Warren appears likely to run for president, and she has a very strong background and a lot of good ideas, and her political opponents would thus prefer to make the central issue be trivial identity politics stuff (her insufficient white pride). What I was commenting on here was how remarkable it the transformation the WR right has made--from tarring the mainstream left with an association with the beliefs of campus activists to fully accepting, endorsing and defending the views of those same campus activists. Though it happens a lot, I never fail to be disappointed by the willingness of those guys to abandon their stated principles in favor of partisanship. I don't wish to see liberals follow suit, but given how infighting on the left hurts the country (we wouldn't have had W or Trump as president if not for that, for example), it would be nice if there were some middle ground--holding onto principles but making intelligent choices with regard to advancing them.