- Joined
- May 10, 2008
- Messages
- 4,518
- Reaction score
- 489
Thanks for agreeing he got hit on the back of the head. I don't really care why it landed there.
You have no idea what is going on lol
Bend the knee
Thanks for agreeing he got hit on the back of the head. I don't really care why it landed there.
You're the one that seems confused.You have no idea what is going on lol
You're the one that seems confused.
You've overplayed this joke.someone get this guy some saline
You've overplayed this joke.
That is totally false and hopefully no one reading this thinks you have any idea what you're talking about. A punch to the back of the head is always illegal. Always. The only distinction made is if the strike is intentional or not.you dont even know the rules to the sport. Ducking and exposing the back of your head during a combo makes you legally open to any strikes to the back of the head. You must protect yourself at all times. you are a idiot.
That is totally false and hopefully no one reading this thinks you have any idea what you're talking about. A punch to the back of the head is always illegal. Always. The only distinction made is if the strike is intentional or not.
I've been watching boxing for over 35 years, don't make up rules when you're talking to me.
Multiple people are wrong. You're one of them and your last post shows total ignorance of the most basic rules of the sport. There are certain areas of the body a boxer can hit and the back of the head is not one of them. There is no rule that says that if you turn then its OK for your opponent to hit you on the back of the head.HAHAHA dude multiple people have told you same thing. You are trying to make a make technicality that's not even correct, a punch to the back of the head is NOT always illegal. If you have been watching boxing for 35 years and dont even know the rules you should not buy anymore PPVs, my wife even knows the rules and she doesn't give a fuck.
Multiple people are wrong. You're one of them and your last post shows total ignorance of the most basic rules of the sport. There are certain areas of the body a boxer can hit and the back of the head is not one of them. There is no rule that says that if you turn then its OK for your opponent to hit you on the back of the head.
1. Hitting an opponent below the navel or behind the ear;
I feel like you are ignoring the fact that this is a well known grey area in all of combat sports. You were comparing it to low blows earlier, but low blows are a lot more cut and dry that "rabbit punches" in boxing. Particularly in a case like this, where there is clearly no intent, and with both guys moving regularly within the parameters of a fist fight, where there are small margins of error.Multiple people are wrong. You're one of them and your last post shows total ignorance of the most basic rules of the sport. There are certain areas of the body a boxer can hit and the back of the head is not one of them. There is no rule that says that if you turn then its OK for your opponent to hit you on the back of the head.
@fdswer
Here is a to the ABC rules and here is the number 1 foul on the list is-
https://www.abcboxing.com/abc-regulatory-guidelines/
Like I said to others, a blow behind the head is treated exactly like a blow below the belt. Its never a legal blow.
Notice it doesn't say anywhere there is an exception. It is a foul, therefore, an illegal blow. Period. The only distinction is if the foul is deliberate or not.
Even looking at that, if shots don't directly hit the balls, they land below the navel all the time. And aren't called, or even judged in any way by the general public. The rules aren't this black and white.@fdswer
Here is a to the ABC rules and here is the number 1 foul on the list is-
https://www.abcboxing.com/abc-regulatory-guidelines/
Like I said to others, a blow behind the head is treated exactly like a blow below the belt. Its never a legal blow.
Notice it doesn't say anywhere there is an exception. It is a foul, therefore, an illegal blow. Period. The only distinction is if the foul is deliberate or not.
I thought it was a bit of a dirty shot but not that bad.I feel like you are ignoring the fact that this is a well known grey area in all of combat sports. You were comparing it to low blows earlier, but low blows are a lot more cut and dry that "rabbit punches" in boxing. Particularly in a case like this, where there is clearly no intent, and with both guys moving regularly within the parameters of a fist fight, where there are small margins of error.
You called it dirty earlier. The word dirty, to me, implies intent.
And yes, I know I am going against saying you are not someone worth conversing with earlier. But you are still going, and whatever.
He didn't turn away in the manner you're referencing. if you turn your back and walk away from the action and the ref stops it, Its not a foul, its quitting. That is not what Wilder did there so stop saying it. You're just making shit up hoping people reading it won't know better. Wilder threw a jab as Fury did , missed and he fell in. He didn't "turn away."turning away from your opponent is also a foul
Everyone knows hitting your opponent in the back of the head is illegal dumb ass, but if you are putting yourself into a position to get hit in the back of the head its not a foul how dense are you.
They are actually.Even looking at that, if shots don't directly hit the balls, they land below the navel all the time. And aren't called, or even judged in any way by the general public. The rules aren't this black and white.