Social Is it homophobic to find two men kissing or having sex in movies off-putting?

How was that studied? Did they find outwardly homophobic guys and get them to secretly admit or secretly engage in homosexual sex acts?
No they hooked them up to monitors and showed them different types of porn.


Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.
 
If I see two gay guys kissing in a movie and it's just part of the plot, that's like so tame. Who cares.

Big difference between that and seeing some dude fellate someone.

People that are super homophobic for no reason are probably a bit gay and in denial.
You expect me to believe that you can't grasp the simple concept that there are people living among you who don't like to watch various things play out in movies and tv shows? Because this post indicates that you're either unable to comprehend that or you're playing stupid.

I don't care that you're not bothered by watching something . By all means watch it. I'm not going to proclaim you a closeted gay man over it. The fact that you're choosing to call others who don't like it "super homophobic" says volumes about you as a person.
 
Researchers believe it has either social benefits or no effect either way.
Animals eating their own poop also has social benefits . . . . yet we're not out piling it on our plates after work.

You guys seem fine with the downward comparison of humans with other animals to justify your stance on what is or isn't "normal". That's a pretty crazy way to go through life.
 
It doesn’t have a negative effect on a species population, thus the countless species thriving who possess it. Researchers believe it has either social benefits or no effect either way. If it had a substantial negative effect it would be killing of all these species, not persisting for generations.

It could have a negative effect but due to the size of the population and the small numbers of this abnormalitie its negative effects are overcome.
 
Animals eating their own poop also has social benefits . . . . yet we're not out piling it on our plates after work.

You guys seem fine with the downward comparison of humans with other animals to justify your stance on what is or isn't "normal". That's a pretty crazy way to go through life.

How many species? Intelligent social ones like us? What are the benefits?
 
It could have a negative effect but due to the size of the population and the small numbers of this abnormalitie its negative effects are overcome.

There’s multiple species where a vast majority of their sexual behavior is same sex and they are thriving so no it has nothing to with small numbers or it being abnormal.


But even if you were right (you’re not) you’re describing how it would still not be an issue because it’s easily overcome. So even a wrong example is one that paints it as a nonissue
 
Last edited:
If everyone is consenting and of age why the fuck shouldn't it be OK?

I was clarifying a point in a debate on what is natural and what is abnormal in a species and using nature as a reference point. It is a civil debate so far.

I have no problem with consenting adults do in their bedroom or who they love. This debate has nothing to do with that.
 
How the fuck did this thread about homosexuality devolve into a discussion about coprophagia?
 
There’s multiple species where a vast majority of their sexual behavior is same sex and they are thriving so no it has nothing to with small numbers or it being abnormal.


But even if you were right (you’re not) you’re describing how it would still not a issue because it’s easily overcome. So even a wrong example is one that paints it as a nonissue

Can you link to these studies that the majority of their sexual behavior is same sex. I would be interested in reading that it has no negative effect on the species.

And yes if the numbers are small in the human population any negative effect as far as survival of the species is over come easily.

However that doesn't make it any less of an abnormality then say blindness at birth or downs syndrome.
 
How many species? Intelligent social ones like us? What are the benefits?
I don't care dude. The point is there are no other species as intelligent as us . . . so I'm not going to model or justify my decisions or behavior after what a non-human species might do.
 
Because an argument was made about natural as a point for both sides of an argument about homosexualty.

Hmm...I see. Well, there are recorded instances of homosexuality and coprophagia in the wild. I don't why there's like 10 pages of extra fluff devoted to this topic in this thread.
 
Can you link to these studies that the majority of their sexual behavior is same sex. I would be interested in reading that it has no negative effect on the species.

And yes if the numbers are small in the human population any negative effect as far as survival of the species is over come easily.

However that doesn't make it any less of an abnormality then say blindness at birth or downs syndrome.


Giraffes, bonobos, bottle nose dolphins all have gay behavior that is more or as common as hetero. None of them are endangered. None have reproductive issues related to low birth rates.

You’re comparing genetic physical disabilities to a common sexual behavior. That’s silly they aren’t comparable.
 
Hmm...I see. Well, there are recorded instances of homosexuality and coprophagia in the wild. I don't why there's like 10 pages of extra fluff devoted to this topic in this thread.

My point in the debate was even if it is in nature it's still an abnormality that is overcome.
 
Back
Top