I totally get his move, but it may backfire considering the baldfather’s ways.
Ya I'm aware. As i stated earlier until The question of contractor classification is resolved a union would be unworkable.
How do you even unionize a sport where a large portion of its participants live in other countries?
I said fighters have been paid when an opponent drops out, which means it HAS been negotiated in the past. The only time we get to see the language in a contract is during rare court battles, for example Couture and Alvarez.Show me the evidence of a fighter having a contract that forces the UFC to pay up even if the fighter fallsout.....I been following MMA for a while...That literally has never been part of a contract.
I do remember on rare fucking occasions, the UFC paying a fighter show money but it was not part of the contract.
https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2018/4/...or-mcgregor-chiesa-borg-lobov-iaquinta-khabib
Yes Fighters can renegotiate in special circumstances like filling up short notice...it's for money tho.
No, my argument is not that....Im realistic enough to know that the UFC would never agreed to such terms....So I understand why fighters don't negotiate it for it...It's literally a losing cause for 90% of fighters unless they have leverage.....Ortega doesn't have leverage at all.
Ortega shouldn't expect it but he has the right to tell the media and be disappointed......Some fighters believe in good faith, sadly they should expect corporations to fuck them over but I understand why Ortega is disappointed in this billion dollar company, not being able to give him $100k or atleast something for the actual work he did....and yes Promos, Media, weight cutting, etc is work.
You're a corporate shill because you are clearly in the side of the UFC and are making shit up by saying Contracts in the past have stipulations about fighters getting show money if the opponent drops out.
I said fighters have been paid when an opponent drops out, which means it HAS been negotiated in the past. The only time we get to see the language in a contract is during rare court battles, for example Couture and Alvarez.
Yes thinking you have some sort of good faith agreement is well intentioned, but naive. I actually fall on the side of the fighters in most financial disputes. I've said over and over, for years, that the ufc lowballs fighters, and their contracts are downright abusive. I said it earlier in this very thread. Being on the side of the fighters has nothing to do with understanding how contracts and corporations work. Fighters are getting screwed for sure. If they don't like it their options are: become an indispensable superstar in the ufc, build a rep and gain leverage crushing cans outside the ufc, become a world champion, get a better manager, or work to unionize. Saying wouldn't it be nice if the ufc wasn't run by douches doesn't get us anywhere. It's true, but meaningless. The word isn't run by nice people doing things out of the goodness of their heart.
If UFC pays fighters when their opponent pulls out, no fighter will ever accept a replacement fight again.
No sir, you are wrong. UFC treats these fighters as contractors. They sign fight agreements. And those fight agreements don't just have a date and time, they have an OPPONENT. If a fighter gets injured, that is a risk the UFC takes, it is their show, they recieve the profits on it. They shouldn't push that risk on the fighters who have held up their end of the agreement.Completely disagree, his job was to fight July 7th. Holloway pulled out. Shit happens, not UFC’s fault. If it were on Friday and they couldnt get a replacement, ortega would deserve full compensation, because he showed up and tried to fight (Ala Pettis and Chiesa with the bus inc
However, this shit was on Wednesday and he was offered two opportunities to stay on the card (AKA, two opportunities to go to work), and he turned them down. It’s a smart move to wait for the title but if you turn down fights, you’re obviously sacrificing your purse this weekend for potentially more money later. It’s clearly one of the cons of not staying on the card.
If you were allowed to turn down replacements and get paid anyway you’d have to be a world class imbecile to ever take a replacement fight when you could get paid to sit with your thumb up your ass.
I didn't say it was in their contract. I said it's come out before that fighters got their show money when their opponent dropped out last minute. Which means, somehow, they negotiated that with the ufc outside the terms of their contract. Or, it was in the terms of their contract and not disclosed. We don't often get contract details unless something goes to court, which typically only happens with high profile fighters that would have above average leverage.@Mike
Again, show me links to fighters getting paid even though their opponent fell out that wasn't good faith....I showed you a link where it happened, but it was clear that it was out of good faith of the UFC since the golden boy, Conor fucked them over.
Couture mention backroom bonuses, never mentioned getting paid even if a fighter drops out...Also both Couture/Alvarez had some leverage unlike Ortega.
I agree fighters are being fucked over and they need to do something to get leverage...However the comments of "If they don't like it, they should of negotiated before hand, their fault" statements are absolutely not grounded in reality. You said it yourself UFC has leverage and fuck over fighters, they would not agree to such terms, specially with Brian Ortega who is a contended, not a huge name, and at the mercy of the UFC.
So yes, I have a problem with giving an unrealistic stupid false statement of "Yeah bro, they should've negotiated, their fault" as if the UFC would agree lol.
I think guys rank 7-12 would gladly stay ready for a chance to jump up the rankings and at the very least, they get an extra payday without delaying their next payday.I've wanted this for awhile (along with cage-side weigh-ins). But surely a nightmare to entice upper echelon guys to be a standby. Combined with the assumption the UFC laughing at the idea of paying a fighter not to fight.. makes it unfortunately unlikely.
Back in africa I learned that poor people will perform any trick of your choice for just a bag of m&m's. I think that's the approach the UFC should use when dealing with fighters. They have become too spoiled
To be fair, we still know very little of Max Holloway's situation. And before 226 we knew nothing at all. Max can be out for a month, for all we know. Ortega may have thought that they may fight for the belt on the next PPV or something.What’s ironic is Ortega said he didn’t want to throw away his title shot but that is exactly what he did.
The ufc handed him an interim title fight where the title holder may never fight at 145 again.
Damn Ortega, the ufc handed this to you on a silver plate and you ran away.
poor or homeless people will do that in murica too
I had this friend (not anymore) that when asked for money, he asked them to dance, which most of them did, and then he gave them a dollar.
I didn't say it was in their contract. I said it's come out before that fighters got their show money when their opponent dropped out last minute. Which means, somehow, they negotiated that with the ufc outside the terms of their contract. Or, it was in the terms of their contract and not disclosed. We don't often get contract details unless something goes to court, which typically only happens with high profile fighters that would have above average leverage.
I didn't say well fuck em for not getting it in writing, but it is not surprising a large corporation doesn't make a habit of giving payouts above and beyond what was promised. If fighters dorpping out last second becomes more common, than yes that is a provision it would be smart to attempt to get in writing. How successful you would be in doing that would depend on your value to them. They let Rory, Benson,Hendo, Werdum, etc walk. Those guys refused to be lowballed and were willing to fight outside of the ufc to get a better contract. They cannot just let everyone go to Bellator. The more guys that are willing to play hardball and actually leave if they get unfavorable terms, the better it will be for other fighters. If fighters keep playing the company man, when veterans are up front that being a company man got them nowhere, they're going to keep getting the same treatment.
you seem out of touch with reality.If UFC pays fighters when their opponent pulls out, no fighter will ever accept a replacement fight again.