Social Chief enforcer of US gun laws fears Americans may become numb to violence with each mass shooting

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Brown
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
4,522
Reaction score
5,483
BY ALANNA DURKIN RICHER
Updated 11:15 AM BRT, February 24, 2024


LEWISTON, Maine (AP) — The head of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says he fears that a drumbeat of mass shootings and other gun violence across the United States could make Americans numb to the bloodshed, fostering apathy to finding solutions rather than galvanizing communities to act.
Director Steve Dettelbach’s comments to The Associated Press came after he met this past week with family members of some of the 18 people killed in October at a bowling alley and a bar in Lewiston, Maine by a U.S. Army reservist who later took his own life.
silhouette-woman-man-morally-support-another-sad-man-concept-support-help-people_556258-951.jpg

He said people must not accept that gun violence is a prevalent part of American life.

“It seems to me that things that we used to sort of consider memorable, life-altering, shocking events that you might think about and talk about for months or years to come now are happening with seeming frequency that makes it so that we sort of think, “That’s just the one that happened this week,’” he said. “If we come to sort of accept that, that’s a huge hurdle in addressing the problem.”

Dettelbach, whose agency is responsible for enforcing the nation’s gun laws, met for nearly two hours at Central Maine Community College with relatives of those killed and survivors of the Lewiston shooting. An AP reporter also attended, along other with law enforcement officials.

Some expressed frustration about missed red flags and questioned why the gunman was able to get the weapon he used. Dettelbach told his audience that they can be a powerful catalyst for change.

“I’m sorry that we have to be in a place where we have to have these horrible tragedies happen for people to pay attention, but they have to pay attention,” Dettelbach said. “I can go around and talk, but your voices are very important and powerful voices. So if you choose to use them, you should understand that it makes a difference. It really makes a difference.”

1000_F_85440597_sE1uUQNtItAbCn9o8fNPMpN9K6OEqI9Z.jpg

Those who met with Dettelbach included members of Maine’s close-knit community of deaf and hard of hearing people, which lost four people in the Oct. 25 shooting at a bowling alley and at a bar.

Megan Vozzella, whose husband, Stephen, was killed, told Dettelbach through an ASL interpreter that the shooting underscores the need for law enforcement to improve communications with members of the deaf community. She said they felt out of the loop after the shooting.

“Nothing we do at this point will bring back my husband and the other victims,” Vozzella said in an interview after the meeting. “It hurts my heart to talk about this and so learning more every day about this, my only hope is that this can improve for the future.”

There are questions about why neither local law enforcement nor the military intervened to take away weapons from the shooter, Robert Card, despite his deteriorating mental health. In police body cam video released to the media this month, Card told New York troopers before his hospitalization last summer that fellow soldiers were worried about him because he was “gonna friggin’ do something.”

Dettelbach, in the AP interview, declined to comment on the specifics of Card’s case, which an independent commission in Maine is investigating. But he said it is clear that the nation needs to make it harder for people “that everyone agrees should not have firearms, who the law says are not entitled to have firearms, to get them because it’s too easy to get them now.”

Dettelbach’s conversation with victims was part of a tour in New England that also included meetings with law enforcement and others to discuss ways to tackle gun violence. Dettelbach, who has expressed support for universal background checks and banning so-called assault weapons, said he regularly meets with those affected by gun violence.

“Each one of these shootings is a tragedy that takes lives and changes other lives forever. And that’s whether it makes the news or not, whether it’s the suicide of a child or a drive by in the city, whether it’s a massacre at a parade, a spray bullets on a subway, whether it’s a man who kills his family, murders police” or a student with a rifle “shooting up their school,” he said during a speech at Dartmouth College on Wednesday.
Woman-emotion.jpg

“I submit to you that it is our patriotic duty as Americans to respond, to think of these people, to have their backs, to view this tough news as a call to action.”

https://apnews.com/article/maine-sh...f-dettelbach-12c3ed0f8d8826b6d13dd88bf185f4e9
 
No other first world country has these problems. Is it really ‘the land of the free’ when everyone has to be aware of the next, inevitable mass shooting that occurs every day or so.
 
It's true I stopped giving a shit about mass murders due to gun violence
 
It will be a good day when the Bruen decision is respected and the remaining unconstitutional AWBs fall. Cargill vs Garland will be a good win for Americans. Trump is a fool.
 
Last edited:
Dettelbach, who has expressed support for universal background checks and banning so-called assault weapons, said he regularly meets with those affected by gun violence.

“Each one of these shootings is a tragedy that takes lives and changes other lives forever. And that’s whether it makes the news or not, whether it’s the suicide of a child or a drive by in the city, whether it’s a massacre at a parade, a spray bullets on a subway, whether it’s a man who kills his family, murders police” or a student with a rifle “shooting up their school,” he said during a speech at Dartmouth College on Wednesday.
Count only the weekly shootings in Chiraq. All other "mass shootings" numbers combined pale in comparison.
 
I don't think it's that we risk becoming numb to mass shootings. I just think half the population of the US doesn't care. Sure, hundreds may die per year. But that tragedy pales in comparison to being inconvenienced when purchasing a gun.
 
I don't think it's that we risk becoming numb to mass shootings. I just think half the population of the US doesn't care. Sure, hundreds may die per year. But that tragedy pales in comparison to being inconvenienced when purchasing a gun.

- I do think they care. but dont think that's gonna happen to someone close.

But theres has to be a deep reason, we have several illegals guns running around here, like a civil war, if you go on a favela tehres several guys holding machine-guns, but they dont go around shooting random people. Let alone go to a school to shoot someone. @BlankaPresident
 
- I think we dont get more shoked either.

It's not that I'm numb to it or not shocked , it's that I don't really get much say in how to address it and the options I've been given are stay exactly how we are , or give up my rights and if those are my choices I'm going to pick my rights.
 
Nobody loves a mass shooting more than a gun grabber.

Your chances of dying in one is close to nil, yet that doesn't stop the elite owned media from fear mongering about it so they can attempt to disarm you.

Also, how does the left not realize the idiocy of pitching a narrative about lethal police shooting black men indiscriminately, while simultaneously pushing for a nation in which only the police are armed? Completely asinine.

It's pretty simple, when the government is telling you that you should give up your guns, you know it's time to get more, because that's a key play for totalitarian regimes, always.
 
There is a constant stream of snuff films out now and many people click on them all. I think they rot your soul drip by drip. I don't want to see people getting hurt or killed.
 
Incredibly unlikely . Just blatant fear porn to make that statement. Start by having more ability to keep tabs on violent offenders.

You always hear the typical we had eyes on them, neighbour's reached out etc. If the people you vote in can't get that done them vote somebody else in until they can.
 
Also, how does the left not realize the idiocy of pitching a narrative about lethal police shooting black men indiscriminately, while simultaneously pushing for a nation in which only the police are armed? Completely asinine.

Because no one is arguing (and don't cite some ubscure fuckwit as a major policy maker) that.

People believe it is possible to have both an armed populace, without retarded gun laws that allow for the mentally unstable, criminals, etc. to have almost unfettered access to guns. We believe this because almost every other first world nation has accomplished it.
 
I don't think it's that we risk becoming numb to mass shootings. I just think half the population of the US doesn't care. Sure, hundreds may die per year. But that tragedy pales in comparison to being inconvenienced when purchasing a gun.
True.
I can't stand to be inconvenienced.
 
Wanting to make tens of millions of Americans overnight felons is a bit more than just "being inconvenienced."

<NoneOfMy>
 
May become numb? Buddy you better get a time machine because we're way past that point.
 
Back
Top