Conor's win over Holloway is irrelevant

Of course it's relevant. It's basically the guy who touched you when you were a kid, coming back for more. You're either going to get revenge...or when the cage door closes, all that heavy breathing comes back into your ears and you get ready to be Mrs McGregor again.

Was that too much?
 
Conor hate knows no bounds. It's some alternate reality where people like to pretend that he hasn't been extremely successful in MMA. Oh what the hell... BURN THE BOOKS! ERASE THE INTERNET! IT'LL BE LIKE HE NEVER WAS!!!
 
It's not irrelevant, but it becomes less relevant every day as Conor's time as an elite fighter draws to a close
 
applesbananas said:
What does the organization have to do with it? Okay, you think Jens Pulver beats prime BJ Penn?
Click to expand...
well it signifies that it was recent enough to still be relevant.

No, but if they fought again the other times they fought would be relevant when discussing the fight
 
MayhemMonkey said:
Nick Diaz is technically undefeated now because he hasnt fought for years
Click to expand...
It's crazy how you even watch this sport. You must have incredibly low IQ or something. Do you think the Nick Diaz from when he fought Diego Sanchez is the same as the one who fought Paul Daley? Anderson Silva? No. He has evolved.
 
applesbananas said:
Can we stop talking about it? Just like Mcgregor/Duffy. He's clearly a much different and better fighter now than when he was like 22 or 23. For Christ's sake, Holloway fought Mcgregor coming off a split decision loss to Dennis Fucking Bermudez. Do you think Bermudez would beat Holloway?

I'm a fan of both Mcgregor nd Holloway, but any retard can see he's changed.
Click to expand...

So to stop people talking about it you make a thread about it, any retard can see that's not the way to go.
Duffy is relevant to Conor as it shows you he hasn't got any better, he's still a striker. Swap an arm triangle loss for a rnc with Nate or neck crank with Khabib.

What's more relevant when talking about a possible Max vs Conor fight than the time where they actually fought FFS. Even if they've both changed (one has more than the other) it's still fucking relevant.

And it's McGregor not Mcgregor, get his name right.
 
MayhemMonkey said:
well it signifies that it was recent enough to still be relevant.

No, but if they fought again the other times they fought would be relevant when discussing the fight
Click to expand...
Well, it would depend on how you define relevant. The fact that someone would go from losing a decision to probably smoking the other guy kinda shows it would be irrelevant.
 
applesbananas said:
It's crazy how you even watch this sport. You must have incredibly low IQ or something. Do you think the Nick Diaz from when he fought Diego Sanchez is the same as the one who fought Paul Daley? Anderson Silva? No. He has evolved.
Click to expand...
GROD.gif


lol that was a fucking joke you goon
 
Congo66 said:
So to stop people talking about it you make a thread about it, any retard can see that's not the way to go.
Duffy is relevant to Conor as it shows you he hasn't got any better, he's still a striker. Swap an arm triangle loss for a rnc with Nate or neck crank with Khabib.

What's more relevant when talking about a possible Max vs Conor fight than the time where they actually fought FFS. Even if they've both changed (one has more than the other) it's still fucking relevant.

And it's McGregor not Mcgregor, get his name right.
Click to expand...
Conor has improved leaps and bounds since the Duffy fight. I don't give a shit about capitalizing his last name.
 
applesbananas said:
Well, it would depend on how you define relevant. The fact that someone would go from losing a decision to probably smoking the other guy kinda shows it would be irrelevant.
Click to expand...
how about how the word is actually defined in a dictionary? seems like the correct way to go about it.
 
both fighters got injured in the 1st round, so we never got to see Holloway vs McGregor at their full potential.
 
MayhemMonkey said:
how about how the word is actually defined in a dictionary? seems like the correct way to go about it.
Click to expand...
So they are relevant in terms of they've fought already. Skill wise their previous fight is irrelevant.
 
I think what TS is getting at here, is it is clear Conor is being effected by some sort of mysterious gravitational time dilation where time passes slower for him than other people. They are able to get better at fighting as time passes, but he is not. This is the only logical explanation as to why he has not evolved one iota since his days of fighting guys like Marucs Brimage and Max. According to my calculations Conor may even be about to pass through the event horizon of a black hole.
 
applesbananas said:
So they are relevant in terms of they've fought already. Skill wise their previous fight is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
thats dumb.... you are acting like only one of them has improved since they fought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,043
Messages
55,463,504
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top