- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 56,248
- Reaction score
- 27,887
No, you liberals still don't get you're wrong in two ways.
One, the dates never happened. The 'accusers' haven't supplied any verifiable proof the dates took place. No photos, no witnesses that they were together.
Two, even if the dates did happen, they were legal.
But the number of accusers that say he dated him when they were above the age of consent are constantly thrown into the two accusers that claim they dated him when they were 15 and 14 years old, one with no evidence and the other with evidence that was forged.
This is a classic example of liberals leaving out key details in your argument, and when you're called out on it you keep repeating it anyway.
Your narriative is more important to you than the truth.
He says, while obfuscating for candidate for Senate that dated high school girls well into his 30s, wants to get rid of Constitutional Amendments, and has a Jew lawyer!
It's only about the narrative and nothing to do with the guy being an obvious piece of shit, you're right.