Law Dems want to decriminalize HIV+ sex with unknowing partners ++UPDATE ITS NOT A FELONY ANYMORE++

ripskater said:
Some gay men see HIV status as a badge of honor that they wear proudly. I'm not joking.

And some of them try to get it.

positive_shirt.jpg
Click to expand...

Yeah don't google 'bug parties' unless you want to dryheave.
 
Pwent said:
technically, but she wasnt a prostitute during the act. its not really relevant for the context of the thread
Click to expand...

Lol at this, does hiv suddenly take a pause?
 
Arkain2K said:
Do not confuse the batshit insane liberals up north with us normal people in SoCal.
Click to expand...

By "the state", I meant the compulsory funded monopoly we call the government. I think there's more mental disease in Southern People's Republic than the North it seems though. Outside of my neighborhood here in SD I'm surrounded by them.

Although I did meet my first in person An-cap the other day...
 
Pwent said:
sleeping with someone, who had sex with someone for money at a different time, is not "frequenting prostitutes"

if someone married a former prostitute, would he be fucking a prostitute every night?
Click to expand...

Lettuce be cereal for a moment

Who are you trying to fool

If you go to another country as a sexpat tourist, probability is extremely high that you frequent them in your native land
 
wlu.29 said:
Lettuce be cereal for a moment

Who are you trying to fool

If you go to another country as a sexpat tourist, probability is extremely high that you frequent them in your native land
Click to expand...

Nobody goes to Japan for sex tourism, it's not like I went to Thailand. If you actually read the thread you would've seen that I refused to pay for sex when I was there

What's your problem with me? Are you just jealous that I bang a lot of girls or something
 
Pwent said:
Nobody goes to Japan for sex tourism, it's not like I went to Thailand. If you actually read the thread you would've seen that I refused to pay for sex when I was there

What's your problem with me? Are you just jealous that I bang a lot of girls or something
Click to expand...

I just don't believe much of what you post
 
wlu.29 said:
I just don't believe much of what you post
Click to expand...

Ok then ignore it, I'm probably the only poster to post nudes, text records and even my college degree to back up my stories, but I don't care about you so I'm not going to continue to talk about myself with you and derail a thread about legislation
 
Pwent said:
Ok then ignore it, I'm probably the only poster to post nudes, text records and even my college degree to back up my stories, but I don't care about you so I'm not going to continue to talk about myself with you and derail a thread about legislation
Click to expand...

Lol at you trying to be credible and making this about legislation and policy

I said from the jump you're being disingenuous and trying to create click bait outrage porn

If you actually cared about that you would have responded to the quote I posted about this affecting sex workers
 
wlu.29 said:
Lol at you trying to be credible and making this about legislation and policy

I said from the jump you're being disingenuous and trying to create click bait outrage porn

If you actually cared about that you would have responded to the quote I posted about this affecting sex workers
Click to expand...

Sex workers need a felony if they are working and spreading this shit.
 
wlu.29 said:
Was it stopping them while it was still a felony?
Click to expand...

You get a lot more time on a felony and that keeps them from spreading it.

If they are caught twice they need some real serious time.
 
I bet whoever proposed this is AIDS infested.
 
This is also a big movement in the gay scene in Toronto currently, such that there has been ablot of push for advertising and government programs to emphasize bareback/unprotected sex in their products (as talk of condoms immediately turns the audience, ie gay men, off of tye message). A lot of this is based around the emergence of Prep and Pep and the push for greater availability and access (many would prefer if there was no lefal need to disclose and everyone just had free and immediate access to those drugs),

It looks like this mostly unprotected push is going to run into a bit of a snaf though with recent findings that several other STI's are making a big comeback, (mostly centered in the gay community), and official support is going to turn back to 'condoms first' messaging.

That said, gay men just want to have unprotected sex. That's really all there is to it, statistically speaking, and not being able to do so causes infected/"pos"(for HIV positive) guys to feel like they are outcasts in thei social groups. The hope is that lessened criminality will cause the stigma of having HIV ("omg, you've got AIDS! You're gonna die!") to lessen, causing more people to get tested (not so afraid of the outcome) and then more conversation to occur between partners. It's entirely a "feelings before facts", feel-good plan, and also ties into a lot of the attempt to end the "stigma" around chem-sex, the other super-risky practice ludicrously common in the gay (male) community.

So much of this frustrates me for various reasons. I'm extremely happy that I'm not actually part of this community, because if I were (and my mind remained the same) I cab only imagine I'd be extremely miserable at the direction it's continuing in.
 
What a stupid fucking argument that guy has.

Any HIV-positive person intentionally putting others at risk should be executed like the scum they are.
 
Ayin said:
This is also a big movement in the gay scene in Toronto currently, such that there has been ablot of push for advertising and government programs to emphasize bareback/unprotected sex in their products (as talk of condoms immediately turns the audience, ie gay men, off of tye message). A lot of this is based around the emergence of Prep and Pep and the push for greater availability and access (many would prefer if there was no lefal need to disclose and everyone just had free and immediate access to those drugs),

It looks like this mostly unprotected push is going to run into a bit of a snaf though with recent findings that several other STI's are making a big comeback, (mostly centered in the gay community), and official support is going to turn back to 'condoms first' messaging.

That said, gay men just want to have unprotected sex. That's really all there is to it, statistically speaking, and not being able to do so causes infected/"pos"(for HIV positive) guys to feel like they are outcasts in thei social groups. The hope is that lessened criminality will cause the stigma of having HIV ("omg, you've got AIDS! You're gonna die!") to lessen, causing more people to get tested (not so afraid of the outcome) and then more conversation to occur between partners. It's entirely a "feelings before facts", feel-good plan, and also ties into a lot of the attempt to end the "stigma" around chem-sex, the other super-risky practice ludicrously common in the gay (male) community.

So much of this frustrates me for various reasons. I'm extremely happy that I'm not actually part of this community, because if I were (and my mind remained the same) I cab only imagine I'd be extremely miserable at the direction it's continuing in.
Click to expand...

What is the pep and prep? Is that one of the drugs that gay men take to decrease chances of getting HIV?

I wonder what percent of gay males are in support of this stuff (not disclosing HIV status). We will probably never know but it would be an interesting stat to have.
 
i do feel sorry for them but no. people should know who's hiv+ and run the other direction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,239,550
Messages
55,636,666
Members
174,866
Latest member
john_k47

Share this page

Back
Top