@BRASIL WAND thinks there is evidence too, see if you can get him to provide it.
Is he Canadian? For some reason, our friends from the North think these weird fucking things.
@BRASIL WAND thinks there is evidence too, see if you can get him to provide it.
I would think this is a horse shit amount meant to get a headlineI think only does not mean what you think it means.
The plaintiff can ask for actual, assumed, and punative damages in a defamation per se case. I dont know how to evaluate the amount, but probably the punative damages would be much greater than the actual and assumed damages.
Sorry for having principles, I’ll always side with the little man against corporations.Your liberal friends are siding with the truth and with basic political responsibility. No one cares about corporations even if they hold firm that it's unsustainable that they be freely trampled and impugned if they don't throw democratic elections for right wing puds.
Your "aha" here is lamer than most of far inferior posters.
WeirdoSorry for having principles, I’ll always side with the little man against corporations.
And found errors....so I'm not up to speed on the guys claims but we know errors happened. They happened in other states too. Are we going to see him sued over scale?
And found errors....so I'm not up to speed on the guys claims but we know errors happened. They happened in other states too. Are we going to see him sued over scale?
You can't sue for hurt feelings. You have to prove actual actual economic loss to be awarded damages.
That figure is probably some kind of projection of lost business opportunities related to the smear campaign that Trump and his minions started.
I'm sure they are aware of how the lawsuit they filed works.
I'm not really a "joiner". I'm usually the one giving the orders, not taking them.If Trump started the MAGA patriot party, would you join it?
I'll put it this way cuz I don't have time to read through all that s*** right now, we'll wait and see what happens. I predict nothingI quoted you the claims. He didn't claim errors. He claimed fraud.
The only way to prove he's wrong, depending on what they're challenging, would be to show how the machine works and how it was used during the voting. I think this will be more than they want to show, since they haven't so far. But in the end it's a pillow guy vs a mega corp. Not sure what damages there could be
I'll put it this way cuz I don't have time to read through all that s*** right now, we'll wait and see what happens. I predict nothing
White knighting the my pillow guy. Alright!In today's tds news