- Joined
- Apr 3, 2015
- Messages
- 10,925
- Reaction score
- 17,000
Finally, a marketplace for unvaxxed cum brought to you by your favourite former national security advisor
Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread Vol. 2
- Thread starter fedorthegoat777
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2002
- Messages
- 11,958
- Reaction score
- 5,403
Keep up the act.
You appear to be getting burthurt here so I'm not going to write out a big long reply here. I'll reiterate.
I'm ignorant about the topic and I know it (although I suspect I've done far more actual research such as statistical modelling and regression analyses than you have but that's an aside.)
You're ignorant and you don't know it. Hence me calling you the poster child for Dunning-Kruger.
Sorry to interrupt this wonderful thread. You can go back to posting research from music teachers and SEO professionals now.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 116,783
- Reaction score
- 50,028
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,363
- Reaction score
- 4,437
Butthurt? no, this is my usual state in the universe.
That you cannot see the cognitive dissonance implied of this own statement vs your past statement.
"most of them go over my head if I'm honest. I'm happy to admit that (although tbf I've not read any of his links for ages)."
I'll break it down for you
"I'm ignorant about the topic and I know it
=/= (On the topic at hand. More bullshit word play that trys to hide the truth behind an implication).
(although I suspect I've done far more actual research such as statistical modelling and regression analyses than you have but that's an aside.)"
Have you done more statistical analysis then Norman Fenton or his partner Martin Neil ? Both spent a lifetime as mathematicians/statisticians as had Joel Smalley. All love to be challenged, make a proxy, head to their substack and question their analysis.
How about Ed Dowd's statistical breakdown of the insurance data, somehow the virus manages to avoid the unemployed yet attack the workers. Perhaps its climate change not his hypothesis that the workers are mandated and must be vacced vs unemployed don't.
"You're ignorant and you don't know it. Hence me calling you the poster child for Dunning-Kruger."
I'm the first to say I'm no expert, its why I use the experts analysis to make my point. While you use your beliefs and opinions and express them as fact. As shown by not knowing a single thing about me yet "knowing" I'm X, Y and Z.
"Sorry to interrupt this wonderful thread. You can go back to posting research from music teachers and SEO professionals now"
You have no need to be sorry, I actively encourage you to post here. Just bring more then your opinions, beliefs and bullshit.
I've watched the honking flock shrink down to less then a handful, their own CT thread abandoned and 300 pages back.
The pattern is ALWAYS the same with everyone of them. Divert, imply, attack the person(poster or expert) but ultimately they always run and hide. Lurking and ready to leap out like batman and prove its safe and effective. Strangely enough its further from that statement by the day.
While I don't remember citing music teaches etc for an epidemiology point etc but no doubt you have something to base your beliefs on (an already formed opinion perhaps). Each to there own and I could have posted 30 experts I've repeatedly cited but why bother.
Statistic/mathematics experts used as resources
Norman Fenton-
"Professor Emeritus of Risk at Queen Mary University of London (retired as Full Professor Dec 2022) and a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in artificial intelligence and Bayesian probabilistic reasoning. I’m a mathematician by training with current focus on quantifying risk and uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks). I have published 7 books and over 400 peer reviewed articles. My works covers multiple domains including especially law and forensics (I've been an expert witness in major criminal and civil cases), and health. Since 2020 I have been active in analysing data related to Covid risk."
Do you have the qualifications to debate old mate Norm on his statistical analysis?
How about Martin Neil ?
"I am a (full) Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at Queen Mary, University of London. My research interests cover Bayesian modeling and risk quantification in diverse areas. My experience in applying Bayesian methods to real problems has convinced me that intelligent risk assessment and decision analysis requires knowledge and data. Not just "Big Data". I am also a joint founder of Agena Ltd. We develop and distribute agena.ai, a software product for Bayesian AI modelling and cloud deployment of Bayesian AI applications. At Queen Mary I teach decision and risk analysis.
I was invited to the Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada in 2010. I was also a fellow at the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University in 2016 on Probability and Statistics in Forensic Science."
You obviously have more experience and expertise than Martin?
How about both together, this is their consolated works over the entire Plandemic. I understand you don't like to read, use experts or facts to base ypur opinions on but if you change your mind this is the best of the mathematics sites, and a bargain, two for the price of one.
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/
Another I have quoted for two years is Joel Smalley, professional statistician, fucking legend, hated by Australian health departments and officers appointed on politics not actual experience.
https://metatron.substack.com/
I'll move on to my favourite epidemiologist, Robert Clancy. I've been using him as my expert for a year and a half iirc
"Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM, MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), PhD, DSc, FRACP, FRCPA, FRS(N) is a practising clinical immunologist with an international reputation for research in autoimmune disease, immunisation and mucosal inflammatory disease. He was Foundation Professor of Pathology at the University of Newcastle, where he established the Newcastle Mucosal Immunology Group, identifying mechanisms of airways protection and the pathogenesis of mucosal disease, and discovered new methods of disease control. He was awarded the first and only Doctor of Science by The University of Newcastle.
Professor Clancy developed the vaccine Broncostat at the University of Newcastle in 1985. The Broncostat vaccine reduces attacks of acute bronchitis to a degree of 90%."
Vaccinologist-
"Dr. Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development. Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer. He then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager and subsequently joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office.
Geert is now primarily serving as a Biotech/Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines.
As a creative thinker, innovator, entrepreneur and visionary, Geert has been invited to speak at multiple international congresses. His work and supportive advice are driven by a relentless passion to translate scientific breakthrough findings into competitive solutions to emerging challenges in public and global health. Dr. Vanden Bossche has become world famous for warning Humanity against the health danger of conducting mass vaccination programs during a pandemic.
You'll find my detailed CV at https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/616004c52e87ed08692f5692/61f409508dc1069610242e5a_2022 detailed CV- G. VANDEN BOSSCHE.pdf.
The latter does not list the multitude of scientific activities I engaged in during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020-2023). The latter can be found on my website: https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/ "
As I said I'm no expert on any of this but I at least cite them to prove the potential of my hypothesis. I at least read and listen to what information I can.
Vs you
Who self admitted has no clue, doesn't read/listen to anything, has no clue what I have done (or not) while explains how ignorant I am whole not even knowing the topic.
Lol irony, you may be able to spell it but you obviously don't understand the meaning of the word.
About my stance.
I was confident enough in my understanding of the treatment to deliberately expose myself to "the worst pandemic the world have ever seen" and treat myself independently of the medical system, as I did for two others.
This doesn't make me right or wrong but it says I believe I'm right and am not a hypocrite like you and the others. All so piss wet scared you'd do anything to feel safer, running from the dark into a box and honking we're the menace, we're the ignorant ones while you lot are burning the books
i.e. hypocrisy of the honkers-
Not fucking one of you will say your vaxx status because you all know there is no explanation for arguing so adamantly for safe and effective while technically being unvaxxed.
- None if you are up to date
- You all have tried your hardest to ignore the question, going so far as to run away from the thread
- None will state the number of shots because it will show your hypocrisy
- None will tell the time of last shot because like above it would show your lack of vaxx.
Hypocritical and ignorance, the bliss of the fool. I'm uneducated compared to the people I cite but so is 99.99999% of the planet. This has no relevance to my right to have an opinion at all, or your for that matter.
As for the lapper, I don't have a tiktok video with pretty pictures and a 30 second span. I've wasted enough time on people and you in particular that don't watch the information, read the source or investigate the qualifications of the expert. You want to be trained, get yourself a whistle and an owner that understands behaviours because you and i are done.
Last edited:
This post certainly seems like butthurt.
You post articles from experts but only the ones that reinforce your pre-existing views and never the ones that oppose your views.
The problem is you lack the expertise in knowing which ones are true or false (got any more research from a music teacher?). Do you understand the things you read? I doubt it.
So you spam links.
Carry on sir.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 116,783
- Reaction score
- 50,028
Can you believe people have been falling for it. For years.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 116,783
- Reaction score
- 50,028
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,363
- Reaction score
- 4,437
Lol, no you over estimate your own importance in my life.
But (1) you're entitled to your opinion no matter the facts or lack there of, (2) as long as you can handle the challenge.
i.e. 1 your statement about my lack of understanding of my topics and
2 you have avoided every actual challenge presented to you.
Whos the music teacher?
What else does he teach?
Are you more qualified to have an opinion?
Do you even know what the topic he quoted was?
Although you MAY have some intelligence (even if you choose not to use it) you're a hypocrite like the lapper. Stating its safe and effective while unvaxxed but pushing the narrative.
My opinion - Too scared to have the required boosters yet that scared you couldn't critically think to avoid any. Book smart perhaps but behaviour dumb and naive, unforgiving combination in the wild, luckily theres no predators in the world hey.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,363
- Reaction score
- 4,437
We've touched on this subject a year or two ago. Old mate Norm was the maths behind the statement that showed the same outcome but with UK data. At the time he said there were three but even those could be argued were fraud.
https://communities.dailyclout.io/campaign/item/cf78208f-297e-479e-a183-4b90d4332f6a/
Zero Young Healthy Individuals Died Of COVID
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/zero-young-healthy-individuals-died-covid-19-israeli-data-show
"Zero Young Healthy Individuals Died Of COVID-19, Israeli Data Show"
All fraudulent bullshit, but the scared little boys and girls fed their own children to a beast so they didn't have to feel as scared. Then fed your flames of "righteous" hate of the unvaxxed for not jumping with you.
I'm not religious but looks a lot like child sacrifice to me.
https://communities.dailyclout.io/campaign/item/cf78208f-297e-479e-a183-4b90d4332f6a/
Zero Young Healthy Individuals Died Of COVID
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/zero-young-healthy-individuals-died-covid-19-israeli-data-show
"Zero Young Healthy Individuals Died Of COVID-19, Israeli Data Show"
All fraudulent bullshit, but the scared little boys and girls fed their own children to a beast so they didn't have to feel as scared. Then fed your flames of "righteous" hate of the unvaxxed for not jumping with you.
I'm not religious but looks a lot like child sacrifice to me.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,363
- Reaction score
- 4,437
More maths, for the sceptical.
https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/unj...n_id=739906&post_id=125636210&isFreemail=true
"Unjabbed Death Rates track COVID jabs
COVID cases do not explain deaths as well as jabs do"
Unfortunately I cannot do the charts etc because I'm as dense as lead for tech on a phone. Still, I like to believe I try harder and what I lack in talent, intellect and body I make up for in focus.
"Because most of the 50-59 year-olds were jabbed before April of 2021, you wouldn’t expect high death in that age group after March of 2021, though you would expect high death in the 40-49 year olds along with a steep drop in death by June 2021 (when most of them were jabbed)."
"For those below age 40, you would expect high death with a steep drop in death by July 2021 or so (after most became jabbed). But here is what happened:
"In young adults, high death “began” after most in the age group were jabbed.
In those of age 40-49, high death also “began” after most were jabbed, but 1-2 months earlier than for the younger age group.
(remember that the rollout worked its way down in age, obviously all the tea the youngens drink)
In those aged 50-59, high death occurred after most were jabbed, just like the younger groups, but shifted forward by another 1-2 months, so that the deaths tracked the jab rates — but not the COVID case rates
COVID cases do not explain the high death rates — because of lacking statistical association with them — but COVID jabs can explain the high death rates, because they are associated with them.
For this reason, COVID jabs among those under age 60 should be stopped (because they are associated with death, even more strongly than COVID is). It is also likely that COVID jabs should be stopped for those over age 60, but the strongest signal is found in the young"
Then we can add in the statistical fraud old mate Norm has highlighted in various interviews. I like this one as its simple to understand and Matty Wong is a little legend.
"He has spoken out loudly and often against 'statistical illusions' that, though convincing, are in complete mathematical error.
The professor believes these statistical illusions have been used by governments to falsely justify many policies, and that even his fellow statisticians who see the error are too afraid to speak out.
Professor Fenton test the voracity of mortality statistics, vaccination statistics, infection/case statistics et al and in this interview he gives both the theory and calculations behind his claims that the world has been conned by bad statistical analysis."
This is probably the 6th time I've posted this link and the fraud is both blatant and obvious, once educated. Like all information/education you have to have an open mind and want to know......
Speaking of fraud, I've highlighted the Australian governments hiding of data and recently the deletion of it, my opinion its to hide culpability.
All our country's are doing similar.
i.e.
https://welcometheeagle.substack.co..._id=1514673&post_id=125598156&isFreemail=true
"VAERS new data 6/2/2023 - Mass deletions
Two weeks in a row, 350 deleted this week, 94 DEATHS gone, same soup de jour (Janssen)."
The memes funny in a dark way but the point isn't. Another 94 deaths due to th J&J deaths scrubbed from the record.
We all remember J&J, safe and effective like Astrazeneca. Until the science changed and it was so unsafe and ineffective that they both were pulled from the market.
It is the same as Australia, the people in positions of power and decisions have been notified that they will be liable not their positions. Senator Rennick has raised this issue in parliament multiple times and now even the msm is reporting on this in NSW.
Usually an employee in Australia cannot be sued personally, its the emploer that gets sued. While there are a few jobs that can most can't BUT as Barrister Julian Gillespie as informed all our doctors (breaching codes of practice) and our Chief Health Officers due to making blatantly false and misleading statements.
He used the cunt Kerry Chant(NSW CHO) specifically due to her love of stating safe and effective which he highlights is clearly false and misleading. The NSW hospital data showed along with the vaers daya. Like the USA Australia has been and still is deleting evidence as fast as they can because they can feel the rope in their imaginations.
https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/unj...n_id=739906&post_id=125636210&isFreemail=true
"Unjabbed Death Rates track COVID jabs
COVID cases do not explain deaths as well as jabs do"
Unfortunately I cannot do the charts etc because I'm as dense as lead for tech on a phone. Still, I like to believe I try harder and what I lack in talent, intellect and body I make up for in focus.
"Because most of the 50-59 year-olds were jabbed before April of 2021, you wouldn’t expect high death in that age group after March of 2021, though you would expect high death in the 40-49 year olds along with a steep drop in death by June 2021 (when most of them were jabbed)."
"For those below age 40, you would expect high death with a steep drop in death by July 2021 or so (after most became jabbed). But here is what happened:
"In young adults, high death “began” after most in the age group were jabbed.
In those of age 40-49, high death also “began” after most were jabbed, but 1-2 months earlier than for the younger age group.
(remember that the rollout worked its way down in age, obviously all the tea the youngens drink)
In those aged 50-59, high death occurred after most were jabbed, just like the younger groups, but shifted forward by another 1-2 months, so that the deaths tracked the jab rates — but not the COVID case rates
COVID cases do not explain the high death rates — because of lacking statistical association with them — but COVID jabs can explain the high death rates, because they are associated with them.
For this reason, COVID jabs among those under age 60 should be stopped (because they are associated with death, even more strongly than COVID is). It is also likely that COVID jabs should be stopped for those over age 60, but the strongest signal is found in the young"
Then we can add in the statistical fraud old mate Norm has highlighted in various interviews. I like this one as its simple to understand and Matty Wong is a little legend.
"He has spoken out loudly and often against 'statistical illusions' that, though convincing, are in complete mathematical error.
The professor believes these statistical illusions have been used by governments to falsely justify many policies, and that even his fellow statisticians who see the error are too afraid to speak out.
Professor Fenton test the voracity of mortality statistics, vaccination statistics, infection/case statistics et al and in this interview he gives both the theory and calculations behind his claims that the world has been conned by bad statistical analysis."
This is probably the 6th time I've posted this link and the fraud is both blatant and obvious, once educated. Like all information/education you have to have an open mind and want to know......
Speaking of fraud, I've highlighted the Australian governments hiding of data and recently the deletion of it, my opinion its to hide culpability.
All our country's are doing similar.
i.e.
https://welcometheeagle.substack.co..._id=1514673&post_id=125598156&isFreemail=true
"VAERS new data 6/2/2023 - Mass deletions
Two weeks in a row, 350 deleted this week, 94 DEATHS gone, same soup de jour (Janssen)."
The memes funny in a dark way but the point isn't. Another 94 deaths due to th J&J deaths scrubbed from the record.
We all remember J&J, safe and effective like Astrazeneca. Until the science changed and it was so unsafe and ineffective that they both were pulled from the market.
It is the same as Australia, the people in positions of power and decisions have been notified that they will be liable not their positions. Senator Rennick has raised this issue in parliament multiple times and now even the msm is reporting on this in NSW.
Usually an employee in Australia cannot be sued personally, its the emploer that gets sued. While there are a few jobs that can most can't BUT as Barrister Julian Gillespie as informed all our doctors (breaching codes of practice) and our Chief Health Officers due to making blatantly false and misleading statements.
He used the cunt Kerry Chant(NSW CHO) specifically due to her love of stating safe and effective which he highlights is clearly false and misleading. The NSW hospital data showed along with the vaers daya. Like the USA Australia has been and still is deleting evidence as fast as they can because they can feel the rope in their imaginations.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 116,783
- Reaction score
- 50,028
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 5,609
- Reaction score
- 7,517
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2002
- Messages
- 11,958
- Reaction score
- 5,403
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 57,719
- Reaction score
- 70,690
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 57,719
- Reaction score
- 70,690
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2002
- Messages
- 11,958
- Reaction score
- 5,403
Cool story bro!
Yeah so is your fake
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 57,719
- Reaction score
- 70,690
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2006
- Messages
- 2,699
- Reaction score
- 224
You're wasting your breath. This is standard behavior for @Strychnine.
