- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 19,726
- Reaction score
- 5,178
No. That is creepy
Imagine 50 @Wadtucket (s) or @Clippy (s).
No... it's a clone, it's a different soul, different person and cloning is perverted nature anyway.
9 months later...cliptuckets
It's literally what happens with monozygotic (identical) twins, how is that more perverted than powered flight or pop tarts??
Twin is still not a clone.
Yes, a monozygotic twin is a clone, they are genetically identical. Why would you say that it isn't?
Of course, the clone would be them, there's no reason not to do it.
It still happened in natural way. And still two different person. We have nature, we don't need cloning.
It doesn't have to happen naturally, it can be encouraged through manipulation of the zygote (egg).
You're using a phone that is beaming data through satellites powered by electricity that comes from the harnessing of nuclear fission. Don't bullshit me about natural being desirable. That's entirely without addressing the naturalistic fallacy you're employing.