- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 28,152
- Reaction score
- 3
Ben Shapiro is good at destroying no nothing SJWs but Andrew Wilkow is better at talking policy and history. Plus Andrew actually knows the constitution
Sounds like you teaching to your students...
That is incorrect. As much as Noam bashes the US, he never fails to mention that it's better than just about any place else to live.Chomsky is a masochist. He's going to be right when our nation fucks something up, because he gets off on self abuse. But the guy fails to see how good our nation is and his self loathing is unbearable .
Ben Shapiro is good at destroying no nothing SJWs but Andrew Wilkow is better at talking policy and history. Plus Andrew actually knows the constitution
ben shapiro has a brilliant political mind. i'm an avid listener of his podcast. another brilliant political mind is dinesh d'souza. ben had dinesh on his show a few months back. it was the only time i ever heard ben listen with complete attention and it sounded as if ben was learning something from dinesh. he even went as far as to call dinesh a genius, at least when it comes to the assessment of the democratic party.
Ben Shapiro is good at destroying no nothing SJWs but Andrew Wilkow is better at talking policy and history. Plus Andrew actually knows the constitution
This talk was pretty good.
I like Ben Shapiro, but, I thought he kind of sold out with his anti-Trump stance.
lol, if you are insinuating that ben does not know the constitution you need to get some facts. Dude knows it very well and is a harvard law grad (just showing he went to a top law school).
If you are insinuating he only debates SJWs see my previous post in thread for education.
It sounds like you might be a trump supporter who hates ben because ben correctly calls out that trump is not a conservative
In the IR front he said it is a baseless boogeyman that the left uses to make up for any reason someone didn't succeed. He continually say, show me a racist policy, person, action etc, and i will fight it with you. But don't just throw out some platitude about IR. I can't do anything about a feeling or a non tangible issue.
And him getting involved in a situation with a coworker has nothing to do with him telling people that facts matter not their buthurt notion of social justice.
He ought to work on his facial expressions to come off as less dislikeable to the people that he is debating with. He will have a hard time convincing anyone to agree with him, despite usually having the more structured argument factually.
And he needs to drop this naive idea that the way to counter "bullying" is by being the bigger bully.
I've never actually seen Shapiro make an argument. He throws out opinions and assertions that might make sense to the politically lay person, and nothing more.
See, you are using a joke to divert from the fact you are way in over your head with this stuff, just like Shapiro. I would love nothing more than to debate his sorry ass.
From the way you talk, I get the impression you are in Academia, you should contact the republican party group at the university you work and I bet there is a very good chance they could set up a debate between you and Shapiro.
I'm going to need some examplesThat is incorrect. As much as Noam bashes the US, he never fails to mention that it's better than just about any place else to live.
The republican party groups are too busy wetting their pants every time I'm in the same room as them to be able to organize a debate.
As for Shaprio, lets just say him and I have crossed paths before. I'll leave it at that.
You're so intellectually intimidating to them, they would be scared to watch you debate someone not in their group?
You're the one who said you would love to debate him.
I would absolutely love to debate him. I would annihilate him.