- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 17,254
- Reaction score
- 4,113
Ricardo López immediately comes to mind.
I think they're pretty close. Both guys weren't absolutely perfect, but they are about as close as you can get.
Ricardo López immediately comes to mind.
Yeah, and Pac is a legitimate all time great.The way he played with Pacman round after round. Looked like two different classes of boxers
Too much of a "slapper"?
There was nothing Floyd didn't do in the ring. He had all the tools but most importantly, the has the best ring IQ I ever saw. No one ever REALLY took Floyd off his game for more than a round or two.
There was nothing Floyd didn't do in the ring. He had all the tools but most importantly, the has the best ring IQ I ever saw. No one ever REALLY took Floyd off his game for more than a round or two.
There was nothing Floyd didn't do in the ring. He had all the tools but most importantly, the has the best ring IQ I ever saw. No one ever REALLY took Floyd off his game for more than a round or two.
Floyd. Look how Leonard ended up. A stepping stone at an age Floyd was still dominating legit competition.To me, there is no doubt Floyd has the highest ring IQ. However, who do you think is technically skilled between Floyd and Sugar Ray Leonard?
A lot of MMA guys in my country didn't believe Mayweather could KO Conor, and that a disaster was in the making because a decision win would be an embarassement to boxing... I told them that Floyd would win EXACTLY the way he did - TKO, accumulation of punches.
However, who do you think is technically skilled between Floyd and Sugar Ray Leonard?
But he got schooled by Lomachenko and that never happened to Floyd even outside his prime.You misspelled Rigondeaux.
In his prime, you'll be hard pressed to find a more refined boxer in history than Rigo.
Mayweather > Rigondeaux.You misspelled Rigondeaux.
In his prime, you'll be hard pressed to find a more refined boxer in history than Rigo.