Interesting stuff if true, does kinda add to why their fanatical one second yet practical the next.
http://www.spiegel.de/international...cture-of-islamist-terror-group-a-1029274.html
Interesting stuff if true, does kinda add to why their fanatical one second yet practical the next.
http://www.spiegel.de/international...cture-of-islamist-terror-group-a-1029274.html
Interesting stuff if true, does kinda add to why their fanatical one second yet practical the next.
http://www.spiegel.de/international...cture-of-islamist-terror-group-a-1029274.html
That article is downright phenomenal. Best analysis I've ever seen, and it totally explains the emergence of ISIS.
Syria - Hezbollah ambushes and ISIS foot convoy, killing about 200 ISIS fighters.
[YT]7tAzQFcuk4c#t=32[/YT]
That video is old as fuck (16 months or something). And it's the SAA ambushing the FSA.
Something tells me those American weapons mostly came from the Iraqi 'army,' as opposed to the Shia militias.
We might as well call the Iraqi army 'Daesh Supply Service' at this point.
Could be SAA + Hez or mostly Hez or just Hez. I found it on a Lebanese forum where the thread stipulation was videos of Hezbollah only action in Syria.
Interesting stuff if true, does kinda add to why their fanatical one second yet practical the next.
http://www.spiegel.de/international...cture-of-islamist-terror-group-a-1029274.html
It was done by SAA. Maybe Hizb helped out but at the time it was widely reported as an SAA ambush. I remember a few days after the attack the FSA said most of the victims (~170) were civilians trying to get the fuck out from East Ghouta.
Which would make sense because for a militia to walk in a huge column in an open field would be really stupid.
If it was civilians the Western press and political establishment would have been all over it , like a dung beetle on dung.
That's what the FSA were saying.
One thing for sure; that video is 16 months old and it's about the SAA blowing up FSA.
Nothing to do with ISIS.
If it was considered true by international observers it would have made the news in the West and Sunni Gulf in a big way .
Saying it didn't make the news in the middle east shows how full of shit you are. It was all over the news in a big way:
Here are a couple of videos from the most popular news channels, Aljazeera and Al Arabiya:
Both confirming it has nothing to do with ISIS. And it was largely carried out by the SAA. And the people getting blown to pieces were FSA/civilians.
Propagate this bullshit to people who don't know what the fuck is going on. Liberals. They would easily fall for this and it would make them nuthug Iran and it's proxies even more.
It wasn't made into a big deal on Al Jazeera or Al Arabiya. I don't doubt it was reported but there is a difference between reporting news and making a big deal of it. Like the claimed Assad chemical attacks .
You shouldn't be lecturing anyone on propaganda since you are a known partisan Kurdish tribalist who hates Iran.
If it was civilians it would have been all over the Western news because powerfull entities in the West want to wage war on Assad or at the very least keep the heat on him because it hurts Hezbollah and Iran.
You might know some details from the war there that some of us here don't but you also misrepresent and or underplay facts that doesn't comport well with your nationalist loyalities. I read the news a lot so I don't fall for your bullshit and see through your bias , evident in previous threads on Iran that you engaged in.