It's impossible for a sane person to even communicate with someone like that. Same guy who has defended Assad gassing people. Real sicko.hahahahaha It's sad that people believe this shit.
Russia hacked the Irish medical system some years ago. Ireland were so unprepared the hackers felt sorry for them and gave them the access codes. They still couldn't solve it.Yeah of course… Russia is among the best at cyber warfare
Right, but the color of the sky is something we can verify, and we don't have to trust the Russian gov't.If the Russians say "the sky is blue," the color of the sky doesn't change just because a Russian pointed out the obvious.
This is interesting, just a few months after it was proven the Russian collusion was a BS and Russian election interference came down to the Facebook Ads, the narrative is back
Russia’s 2024 election interference has already begun
Moscow is spreading disinformation about Joe Biden and other Democrats to lessen U.S. military aid to Ukraine and U.S. support for NATO, former U.S. officials and cyber experts say.www.nbcnews.com
Do you believe Russia is truly capable of interfering?
Also, the key aspect wasn't FB ads but hacking and dissemination of private communications. And now it's come out that this whole Biden took bribes from Ukraine story that the House GOP has been obsessed with is lies on behalf of Russian intelligence.Of course they are, it's ongoing and doesn't just start with the election. China too.
LOL @ this Russian propaganda.
All Russia has to do is withdraw from Ukrainian territory and poof, instant peace.
How'd those Russians get there?Except for the ethnic Russians in Donbas.
Also, we now know that Putin was lying about ethnic Russians being killed there as a weak justification for the invasion. These are same ghouls who were talking about Saddam having nukes.
Why would Russia retreat if they are winning?
Obviously they want peace without the security threat that allowing Ukraine to join NATO would present to them.Because "Russia cares for peace".
Thanks for being honest though, there won't be any peace as long as Russia is winning, therefore the best way to ensure peace is to make Russia lose.
What in my post..... In my premises or conclusions hasn't been verified? The stories aren't only reported in Russian media.Right, but the color of the sky is something we can verify, and we don't have to trust the Russian gov't.
It's not rational to believe something because you hear it from Russian gov't sources, while you seem to think that anything we hear from the Russian gov't is unquestionably true. This why you routinely try to justify atrocities and oppression all over the world. It's an interesting look at how intellectual rot also leads to moral rot (and of course we see the opposite regularly here).
Obviously they want peace without the security threat that allowing Ukraine to join NATO would present to them.
Never said that at all. The Russians have been saying since before the special military operation began that they are always open to peace talks.They will only want peace when they are losing, those were your words.
Which is a good reason to be broadly against war, with only very particular and extreme circumstances being justifications. Everyone who doesn't have their heads up their asses knows that Russia has no such thing.Your logic here is a bit ridiculous. The same could be said of any war, invasion or occupation.
They're open to peace deals that get them what they want, like anyone would be. The point is that the concession Ukraine would have to make would constitute crimes against humanity, which is why all offers thus far have been non-starters. And it's a war, not a special military operation.The Russians have been saying since before the special military operation began that they are always open to peace talks.
Never said that at all. The Russians have been saying since before the special military operation began that they are always open to peace talks.
Hell, there was a peace deal signed by the diplomats in March 2022 that Zelensky backed out of. Ukraine got the best deal they could've possibly gotten back then.
They Russian government wants realistic terms for negotiations. Ukraine is acting like their negotiating position got stronger even though they've lost 20% of their land and only lose more every week.
You said "why would Russia negotiate when they are winning", this implies that Russia only negotiates while losing.Never said that at all. The Russians have been saying since before the special military operation began that they are always open to peace talks.
Yes, the peace deal that required Ukraine to disarm and had no security guarantees whatsoever.Hell, there was a peace deal signed by the diplomats in March 2022 that Zelensky backed out of. Ukraine got the best deal they could've possibly gotten back then.
Russia is acting like they are at the gates of Kyiv, Russia has gained land at the cost of blood, but that doesn't means they can dictate terms of surrender.They Russian government wants realistic terms for negotiations. Ukraine is acting like their negotiating position got stronger even though they've lost 20% of their land and only lose more every week.
No..... You can read my original post. I said "why would Russia retreat if they are winning." They have been open to negotiations since long before February 2022.You said "why would Russia negotiate when they are winning", this implies that Russia only negotiates while losing.
Yes, the peace deal that required Ukraine to disarm and had no security guarantees whatsoever.
Russia is acting like they are at the gates of Kyiv, Russia has gained land at the cost of blood, but that doesn't means they can dictate terms of surrender.
Yea that’s what I thought, I heard that a lot in 2020. Meanwhile in 2024Strange I thought our elections are perfectly secure. That is what I keep hearing from leftists about the last one. It was like totally legit. So which is it?