- Joined
- Oct 18, 2014
- Messages
- 3,389
- Reaction score
- 1,126
Many accuse joe rogan of giving alt righters a platform but he more so exposes them. Candice Owens was simply not prepared.
You calling it the Coase theorem doesn't change anything about what I said. Libertarianism is especially stupid when it comes to environmental guidelines and fighting construction fraud and toxic waste.No, its called the Coase theorem. That "problem" has been solved half a century ago. Learn what you're talking about.
He thinks the market will self-correct construction fraud and toxic waste dumping, via snapchat.Who the fuck is Dave Rubin, and why should I give a shit?
He thinks the market will self-correct construction fraud and toxic waste dumping, via snapchat.
You calling it the Coase theorem doesn't change anything about what I said. Libertarianism is especially when it comes to environmental guidelines and fighting construction fraud and toxic waste.
What I said is true: he thinks the market will correct itself and construction fraud and toxic waste dumping will just vanish.
Yes, I'm stupid for not believing in libertarian la-la land.Those externalities are corrected for in market economics…. But you wouldn't appreciate that because you're a simpleton opining on shit you don't understand even at a fundamental level.
Who the fuck is Dave Rubin, and why should I give a shit?
Yes, I'm stupid for not believing in libertarian la-la land.
Way to miss the point, again.Its not about being in a libertarian la-la land you dolt. It's basic economics about an issue that was described and handled a half century ago.
Way to miss the point, again.
Let's rehash: I said that his libertarian views on government regulations are ridiculous and your rebuttal is "it has a name and it's been talked about half a century ago!".I beg your pardon. You're missing the point. You've formed an opinion on something you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
the theory you mention is pretty much known as unworkable in any modern setting..... so no, you are wrongThose externalities are corrected for in market economics…. But you wouldn't appreciate that because you're a simpleton opining on shit you don't understand even at a fundamental level.
Good on you for listening. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt and I really hate it when I feel like "yeah I could've known this without listening".I actually did listen to a lot of that Candace Owens interview because people on here kept talking about her (well, posting her Tweets). Unsurprisingly, she came across as completely ignorant. She is a mascot, basically. People who hold her beliefs love the fact that she's black and conservative, and because of that they are willing to ignore the fact that she's vapid and uninformed. Or maybe more likely, her fans are vapid and uninformed as well, so they don't even realize that she's vapid and uninformed.
But I've been saying this for a while. For some reason some people take pride in being uninformed. As if they came to a point in their life when they realized that could not keep up with more intellectually capable people, so they decided it would just be cool to "tell it like it is" without actually knowing anything. It's not cool, it's dumb.
Good on you for listening. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt and I really hate it when I feel like "yeah I could've known this without listening".
Wasn't Owens running some "liberal" scam a couple of years ago?
I question her "conservative" credentials beyond the most superficial and stereotypical American "conservative" positions. In my opinion, she's pulling off a pretty obvious con.