- Joined
- Jun 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,134
- Reaction score
- 2,256
I actually thought would Sean surprise people and have 2 or 3 defenses at least, and well, he was a coinflip away from being en route to that. I can be invested in fights, but there's always the tension associated with the "will this be the time so and so is dethroned", and then when they eventually are, the moment is cemented as historical. Title defenses create stars, and when stars blow up, it's dramatic. Think of Ronda/Holly. One of the biggest moments in UFC history that wouldn't have been nearly as big if Ronda hadn't been running through everyone and entered the fight a massive favorite as a result.I 100% agree with your last sentence. Personally I don’t need belts or long reigning champs for my fights to be exciting or to be invested in a fight. Whether Jon reigned for 10, 20, 30 years it wouldn’t have mattered to me. There was plenty of exciting fights. I don’t think anybody expected Strickland to hold the belt for long.
Just my preference. If all is well and good to you even if the above situations don't come to fruition, then who am I to argue?