All that moving Loma does is not gonna be enough for the TANK that Errol is.
Those body shots will stop Loma from dancing
Huge fan of Loma but no1 is touching Errol
to be fair, I've become a fan of loma lately too, and I don't disagree that he's lose ot Spence. I'm just curious why anybody would want to see that fight.“Huge fan of Loma”
FOH
to be fair, I've become a fan of loma lately too, and I don't disagree that he's lose ot Spence. I'm just curious why anybody would want to see that fight.
I don't disagree either. I know he'd lose to Spence. Your last statement is why I told him to get lost. It's a hypothetical fight with the result being a guaranteed loss as the odds are completely stacked against him. No genuine fan of a fighter constructs such a mythical match-up in their head only to conclude the obvious. There's nothing to debate here because there's no rational conversation to be had. It makes me wonder why such a self-proclaimed fan of said fighter would make such a thread. Loma vs Spence is analogous to Hamed vs Barrera? He has to be trolling.to be fair, I've become a fan of loma lately too, and I don't disagree that he's lose ot Spence. I'm just curious why anybody would want to see that fight.
he clearly is trolling. Rather poorly so. I mean, just from a purely analytical perspective, Loma and Naz aren't that similar in style, and Spence and Barrera aren't either. Just a waste of time TBH. But more his own htan anybody else's.I don't disagree either. I know he'd lose to Spence. Your last statement is why I told him to get lost. It's a hypothetical fight with a result being a guaranteed loss as the odds are completely stacked against him. No genuine fan of a fighter constructs such a mythical match-up in their head only to conclude the obvious. There's nothing to debate here because there's no rational conversation to be had. It makes me wonder why such a self-proclaimed fan of said fighter would make such a thread. Loma vs Spence is analogous to Hamed vs Barrera? He has to be trolling.
This isn't really an interpretation of Naz's career that I agree with. Naz fought some quality fighters. Sure, he wasn't fighting killers every time out, but I think his resume is better than most fans, particuarly American fans, want to acknowledge (part of this might also simply be a reaction to his British fans, who treat him as the best thing since sliced bread).Except the difference is Loma has fought and beaten champions while Naseem fought 98% of his career against nobodies who made him look good, I doubt Loma would beat Spence but its harsh to compare Loma to Naseem lmao.
This isn't really an interpretation of Naz's career that I agree with. Naz fought some quality fighters. Sure, he wasn't fighting killers every time out, but I think his resume is better than most fans, particuarly American fans, want to acknowledge (part of this might also simply be a reaction to his British fans, who treat him as the best thing since sliced bread).
Beating erik morales twice and knocking down Marquez and winning 3 weight belts should atleast make u great.I honestly can't think of any notable opponents Naz beat, Barerra to me was never that great of a fighter either and he made Naseem look like a cab driver. I'll say that the chronic hand issues Naz had would have attributed to him not fighting a lot of quality fighters.
Beating erik morales twice and knocking down Marquez and winning 3 weight belts should atleast make u great.
And I think Marco is a disrespectful piece of shit.