WTH?
The Dawson case is nothing like the Jones fiasco. Dawson didn't "pulse" nor was he punished and then allowed to continue to pop because of claims that there was "no re-ingestion". The Dawson case was dropped because it was determined that he wasn't under USADA rule at the time that the banned substance was taken.
What articles would those be?
USADA has made a questionable, and conflicting, statement. Otherwise it's been accountant Jeff Novitzki describing "pulsing" as a hypothetical example for what USADA claims is happening with Jones' tests. In the same breath they also go on to mention how there are no studies, nor any other cases, that would support the "pulsing" theory. How they don't know how long it may "pulse" for, nor that they don't know if there was re-ingestion (only that they can't prove that there was, because they basically didn't see Jones take it).
As far as everything I've read/heard/know, the test for the long term metabolite (M3) has improved, thus allowing detection for a longer period of time (went from just days to 4-6 months - but now USADA is saying possibly years even though they readily admit that they do not know much about turinabol "pulsing" and have no studies to prove/disprove any of this?). BUT, they seem to hinge the decision on re-ingestion on the short/medium term metabolites, which AFAIK still has a very short detection window (i.e. <20 days).