All drivelPast and post behavior are often and indicator of what you will do in a situation like the altercation between him and Martin. Given his routine domestic issues that have sprung up and him apparently thinking its a fine idea to sell the gun you blew someone away it i think its safe to say he likely has some serious issues. And no the media back lash he has gotten is not an excuse for this behavior nor should it draw sympathy.
Zimmerman was a victim of his own stupidity. When you are not authorized and trained to function as law enforcement you should refrain from doing so. The fact of the matter is he ignored the 911 operators instruction to stand down because he wanted to play a fucking cowboy. There was no immediately threat to him or bystanders from Martin from him doing so the motive for his actions are clear as day.
I find if laughable to think he approached the boy with a "Good evening sir sorry to trouble you but may I ask what you are doing in this area?"
While I'm sure Martin didn't gave a calm response either who would? If a stranger followed you and then got out of his car to confront you odds are you would tell them to go fuck themselves too and be ready for a fight.
And again this still goes back to the reality that Zimmerman initiated the confrontation for no sensible reason. The fact he got away with it just shows a failure in our justice system and pew pew culture run amok.
Mind you as well, with the recent media hysteria shootings of the past few years i find them to be incredibly biased and with little merit and I tend to side with the shooter but this just isn't the case.
All drivel
In a court case provide evidence Zimmerman ran up and shot Martin out of nowhere
You have none
Not guilty
Move on
He got his comeuppance later when they could prove he was guilty
he was told isn't a law and no he wasn't. the lady said we don't need you to do that. nothing you said has any weight anywhere except in your mind. you have shit. zero. zip. nadda. don't be a lawyer.He was told not to approach him and he did how is this not starting the shit storm? You can not just follow people around because they are walking down the street "looking " around and you have a "feeling" that literally fits under the legal definition of harassment and stalking
The fact he on the records stated "these assholes always get away" as well shows his attitude and mental state. He already made up his mind and took a hostile stance.
Also OJ wasnt guilty either bruh. I guess that settles it.
he was told isn't a law and no he wasn't. the lady said we don't need you to do that.
nothing you said has any weight anywhere except in your mind. you have shit. zero. zip. nadda. don't be a lawyer.
being an asshole isn't a crime, it just makes zimmerman an asshole
and they didnt. He was
1. Unarmed
2. Wasn't breaking into anything
3. Wasn't attacking anyone
What logical reason would you confront someone for given those things are off the table and you're not a cop?
Do we have to replay the video?^^^^
Yeah you just resorting to "well the law decided" is a piss poor argument. Its expects us to suspend a massive amount of logic and believe all rulings under law are just and fair.
The law is the law. Suck it. It's there to proteCt you too. Better 1000 guilty men go free and all that jazz. There was no evidence to convict with. You're wrong. You lose. Zimmerman won get over it.
Present any evidence you have below. Yeah but since then he's done x is not evidence except in that case. He's a piece of shit. He's just also a not guilty piece of shit
he very well fit the bill to be legally charged with manslaughter. the prosecution screwed threw the pooch with their overcharging
also i didnt lose any sleep over the verdict youre reaching again with you conclusions unsurprisingly
well to be fair, nothing happens when cops lie about what happened in confrontations with civiliansHe should get in some kind of trouble for lying imo. It's the same as women who accuse men of rape when nothing happened. There needs to be repercussions for this type of behavior.
He was told not to approach him and he did how is this not starting the shit storm? You can not just follow people around because they are walking down the street "looking " around and you have a "feeling" that literally fits under the legal definition of harassment and stalking
The fact he on the records stated "these assholes always get away" as well shows his attitude and mental state. He already made up his mind and took a hostile stance.
Also OJ wasnt guilty either bruh. I guess that settles it.
Wasn't Florida lacking a specific type of manslaughter? I looked this up a long time ago and there was an issue with the wording I thought. Been too long
Stand your ground was not used as a defense. That was a bullshit talking point that wasn't even debated during the trial."Stand your ground".
The trial was a waste of time.
Yes, you can follow people. Walking behind someone is not against the law. lmao.
YAlso, Trayvon was tresspassing in a neighborhood that was constantly being burglarized.
Zimmerman followed Trayvon while on the phone with 911. The 911 operator told him to stop following. He agreed to this and TURNED AROUND and began walking to his truck.
That fat jabba the hut friend that Trayvon was on the phone with that night confirmed it. .
so what is the law you are claiming he broke? following someone in public is legal, homieEven by sherdog standards no one is obtuse enough to equate traveling down the same path as someone with profiling them and tailing them then getting out of your car to pursue them
zman testified that he was actually walking on people's yards, in a way that suggest he was scopping out the houses.Unless more came out to my knowledge his dad or his dads gf has a house in that gated community that he was staying at So no walking down the street in a neighborhood you're staying in doesn't not qualify as trespassing
so many ridiculous things in this paragraph. how are cops able to tell how many punches zman took? can you look at anderson silvas face after any of his fights and be able to tell how many he took? who gives a shit how many he took? he had physical evidence that supported he got hit.According to Zimmerman he turned around. You're supposed to take the word of a man who clearly lied about the amount of punches he took(even the cops scoffed at this), whos own story about how he managed to grapple with Martin to be able to grab at his gun makes no physical sense what so ever, and is doing kooky shit like lurking around a business and lying about being employed as a security officer there and having barricaded stand offs with the cops.
we dont, so we look at all the evidence to see if it colloborates his story or not. No evidence you can come up with is strong enough to disprove his claims.Theres two peoples who stories matter most. One is dead and cant say shit and the remaining one is clearly a pathological liar with a lengthy history of anger issues. Why in sweet fuck would you lap up anything that comes out of his piehole?
shit doesnt work like that. she said in her own words that he was going back to deal with him and she tried to talk him out if it. she LITERALLY TESTIFIED that she thought he was going back to fight zman. just because she was a shit witness for the prosecution doesnt mean you get to toss out her testimony, hahaJabba actually retracted her statement under scrutiny in court and acknowledged she couldn't ascertain who attacked who based off the phone call so wrong again. Though her whole testimony was a giant mess so using her one way or the other doesn't help.
Even by sherdog standards no one is obtuse enough to equate traveling down the same path as someone with profiling them and tailing them then getting out of your car to pursue them
Unless more came out to my knowledge his dad or his dads gf has a house in that gated community that he was staying at So no walking down the street in a neighborhood you're staying in doesn't not qualify as trespassing
According to Zimmerman he turned around. You're supposed to take the word of a man who clearly lied about the amount of punches he took(even the cops scoffed at this), whos own story about how he managed to grapple with Martin to be able to grab at his gun makes no physical sense what so ever, and is doing kooky shit like lurking around a business and lying about being employed as a security officer there and having barricaded stand offs with the cops.
Theres two peoples who stories matter most. One is dead and cant say shit and the remaining one is clearly a pathological liar with a lengthy history of anger issues. Why in sweet fuck would you lap up anything that comes out of his piehole?
Jabba actually retracted her statement under scrutiny in court and acknowledged she couldn't ascertain who attacked who based off the phone call so wrong again. Though her whole testimony was a giant mess so using her one way or the other doesn't help.
so what is the law you are claiming he broke? following someone in public is legal, homie
And again according to someone who is clearly documented habitual liar. Why does this seemingly allude you? The biggest help to his case is his own word which is worth little given hes routinely dishonest and a frequent law breaker himself.zman testified that he was actually walking on people's yards, in a way that suggest he was scopping out the houses.
so many ridiculous things in this paragraph. how are cops able to tell how many punches zman took?
this elaborate story you claim was quite simple. a neighbor testified that he came out of his house to see what looked like trayvon on top of zman. zman testified that he then went down for his waist band when his shirt came up. not that ridiculous at all
shit doesnt work like that. she ssid in her own words that he was going back to deal with him and she tried to talk him out if it. she LITERALLY TESTIFIED that she thought he was going back to fight zman. just because she was a shit witness for the prosecution doesnt mean you get to toss out her testimony, haha
Are you honestly trying to say that statue applies?Section 784.048 (2) of the Florida Statutes states when “a person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person” the person is guilty of the offence of stalking.
stalking and unlawful pursuit bubba.
maybe he's a liar, but I believe it's likely he's telling the truth here about seeing trayvon on people's yards. Doesn't really matter if I believe him or not in this specific situation. He can follow anyone he wants to in public as long as it's not "willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly".And again according to someone who is clearly documented habitual liar. Why does this seemingly allude you? The biggest help to his case is his own word which is worth little given hes routinely dishonest and a frequent law breaker himself.
Zimmerman claimed he was punched 30 or more times in the face. Theres literally no way this happened. Here lakes take a medical examiners opinion on it since she knows better than you or myself
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/george-zimmerman-jury-told-injuries-insignificant/story?id=19552856
And then it makes no sense why according to him Martin would reach into his waist band when he had no weapon on his person then suddenly decided to flee then suddenly decide to run back to fight him unless Mr. Martin was having a severe bipolar episode.
Start around 12 minutes. zimmerman by his own account has the most double jointed arms known to man to be able to pull that off
Actually it does work just like that. The person testifying is grilled by the defense to determined if they are lying or stretching the truth. Zimmerman own attorney got her to admit she couldn't honestly tell who started the actual physical combat so why is this a point of contention with you? Its what his own defense team wanted to get out her.