Montreal to Lift Controversial Pitbull Ban

Do pit bulls have the locking jaw?

I remember this guy would walk to the park to smoke a blunt with the youngings with his pitbull.

He would pull a low branch down from a tree, order the dog to jump and bite it and the dog would hang there for a good 5 minutes as we would smoke a blunt.

The good old 90s baby.
 
A dog breed adopted by the hip hop culture to be viewed as a mean angry dog.

That is the image they are given and that's how hip hop followers raise them.

Lots of dog fighting goes on within some cultures where I am from.

You know why they chose them? Because they're dangerous. That doesn't mean they're good guard dogs either; they're more likely to kill the person who feeds/lives with them.
 
Do pit bulls have the locking jaw?

I remember this guy would walk to the park to smoke a blunt with the youngings with his pitbull.

He would pull a low branch down from a tree, order the dog to jump and bite it and the dog would hang there for a good 5 minutes as we would smoke a blunt.

The good old 90s baby.
Nope, just a normal canine jaw.

They're just freakishly strong, capable, and strong willed. They've spent the last two-three hundred years breeding these dogs for their physically and the desire to fight to their last breathe.
 
Nope, just a normal canine jaw.

They're just freakishly strong, capable, and strong willed. They've spent the last two-three hundred years breeding these dogs for their physically and the desire to fight to their last breathe.

What dog does?

I remember a story of a cop shooting a dog who was still locked on after he was killed.
Had to get a crow bar to pry it off
 
What dog does?

I remember a story of a cop shooting a dog who was still locked on after he was killed.
Had to get a crow bar to pry it off

I have no clue about that story but muscles can contract during and for a while after death. Pit bulls have normal canine jaws, there's no difference in their mechanism for biting and holding.
 
Absurd, terrible, ignorant argument.


#1 DOG BITE STATISTICS RESOURCE
http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-recent-dog-bite-statistics.php


Empirical studies demonstrating the acute predisposition to violence among Pitbulls:
  1. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/images/dogbreeds-a.pdf
  2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610618/
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235708
  4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.12094/abstract
  5. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA381425
  6. http://blues.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Aut...ext=images/ejour/m_samj/m_samj_v97_n8_a16.pdf
  7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1424716/
  8. http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsur..._Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

Logical refutations of popular Pitbull apogism
  • Why are owners so much more likely to be bad owners if they own pits?
  • Why are witnesses so much more likely to mis-identify Pits vs. other breeds based on visual inspection? Why does this mathematically skew only one way?
  • Why are Pits' raw murder and mauling figures so absurdly high disproportionate to other large breeds that are similarly popular?
  • Where is the evidence to substantiate any of these popular, casual colloquialisms? For example, if you give a reason for why Pit Bull owners are more likely to be bad owners, do you have evidence to substantiate that?
  • Ask yourself: why are all of these rationalizations only applied to the defense of Pits, and never for other dogs?

Pit bulls make up 6% of the dog population and are responsible for 68% of dog attacks and 52% of dog-related deaths since 1982 as reported in a TIME magazine story "The Problem With Pit Bulls" by Charlotte Alter, June 20, 2014.

An April 2011 issue of Annals of Surgery reported that "these breeds should be regulated in the same way other dangerous species, such as leopards, are regulated." That report was shared with Time magazine by PETA, the animal-rights organization.


ZSJnUQ23DszYeMLhxXSSmMO5JYk8oL8uuVPQKBzZtND3NMJfboepdoy3VwHweKYUPwohhou8mzoG5aE-tCrb30QUt0D89JNNoBmNO0HeMgC8sC7Y14UqsybBGeTWizgzKcPo8Glz



http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/12-year-dog-bite-fatality-chart-dogsbiteorg.pdf

qcAI2UP4v5t5X9GK6jwQrcpvtGkABRBkOKz8TkMyqJGzFRwHqkmJgfxvl8Zg6-_DOgrDp9nTEpX5mxB8LZevIDW6pOMqoeiZ9HW3JcCB0oAUh5QXK4VUlCO5_3UoSnDz-7Rpwuq2




Dog Bite Statistics for 2016

83-k8I8jTGZ9deBY9DclOmky0CL9krdhe0BMt1YgRA3Nl7thjcRYHRZLLIWhhMUeeYt4ChK2dzXArQvH_qmvsJUNAn1T4ZVVOI-iDDaGZcTyakorAcPTe9Uo99lvewZM6An7ipUV



2016 dog bite fatalities
Statistical information gathered by DogsBite.org is verifiable1 through collected news reports. Our Fatality Citations section documents each source used in our dog bite-related fatality research.

2016 dog bite fatality statistics
  • 31 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2016. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 900 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 71% (22) of these deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6% of the total U.S. dog population.2
  • Together, pit bulls (22) and rottweilers (2), the second most lethal dog breed, accounted for 77% of the total recorded deaths in 2016. This same combination also accounted for 76% of all fatal attacks during the 12-year period of 2005 to 2016.
  • The breakdown between these two breeds is substantial over this 12-year period. From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days, versus rottweilers, which killed 43, a citizen every 102 days (Related graph).
  • In 2016, the combination of pit bulls (22), their close cousins, American bulldogs (2), and rottweilers (2) contributed to 84% (26) of all dog bite-related fatalities. Both American bulldog cases involved dogs acquired in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
  • Labradors and their mixes contributed to 3 deaths in 2016, followed by 6 breeds, each with 2 deaths: American bulldog, Belgian malinois, doberman pinscher, German shepherd, mixed-breed, rottweiler and 2 cases with unreleased breed data.
  • Annual data from 2016 shows that 42% (13) of the fatality victims were children ages 9-years and younger and 58% (18) were adults, ages 30-years and older. Of the total adults killed by canines in 2016, pit bulls were responsible for 67% (12).
  • In 2016, female victims (16) were greater in number than male victims (15). Among children ages 9-years and younger, male deaths were greater, 62% vs. 38% and among adults 59-years and older, female deaths outpaced males, 75% vs. 25%.
  • In 2016, infants 3 to 6-days old accounted for 31% of all child deaths. In one case, a pit bull-mix was lying in bed with the baby and its parents when it attacked. The family had adopted the dog 5-months earlier from the San Diego Humane Society.
  • 42% (13) of all dog bite fatality victims in 2016 were either visiting or living temporarily with the dog's owner when the fatal attack occurred, up from 32% in 2015. Of this subset of 13 fatalities, 77% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 32% (10) of attacks resulting in death involved a dog or person new to a household (0-2 month period). Children 9-years and younger accounted for 80% (8) of these deaths. Of this subset of 10 fatalities, 70% (7) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 61% (19) of all fatalities involved more than one dog, up from the 11-year average of 44% (2005 to 2015). 35% (11) of all deaths involved 2 or 3 dogs and 26% (8) involved a pack attack of 4 or more dogs, up from the 11-year average of 14%.
  • 29% (9) of all dog bite fatalities in 2016 involved breeding on the dog owner's property either actively or in the recent past; pit bulls accounted for 67% of these deaths. 3% (1) involved tethered dogs, down from the 11-year average of 10%.
  • Dog ownership information for 2016 shows that non-family dogs inflicted the majority of deaths, 55% (17). Of this subset, 59% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls. Conversely, only 19% (6) of attacks resulting in death occurred off the dog owner's property.
  • Family dogs inflicted 45% (14) of all deaths in 2016; family pit bulls accounted for 86% (12) of these deaths, up from an 11-year average of 63%. Of the 22 fatal pit bull attacks, 55% (12) involved a family or household member vs. 45% (10) non-family.
  • In 2016, only 6% (2) of all deadly attacks resulted in meaningful criminal charges; the lowest level on record.3 2016 also marked the first time a police officer's "personal" attack-trained K-9 killed a person; he was charged with two felonies.
  • California led all states in fatal attacks in 2016 incurring 6 deaths; 67% of these deaths were inflicted by pit bulls. Florida, North Carolina and Texas each followed with 3 deaths. South Carolina, a routine dog bite fatality state, incurred no deaths.
  • See: Discussion notes | See: Full news release
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed (2005 to 2016)
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Age Groups
  • See: 2016 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs
  • Social Media Graphic: 2016 U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Statistics
  • Social Media Graphic: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed

Death & Mauling Statistics for Niagara Falls, NY
eIpYQHTmn45Y-ub7BBWKaFqaZCLBu0W6yyM8PF3vTJq6TSWyy2N_su7T8By1D8yQgzxYRcwL_1Bfl5ldPDHP_DUrj6A5Ct_OtDCmz8ndNuHCcGQ9od60eKbIv5WeKbrr1BCJOqxz



Washington Post: Dog mauls owner to death during interview with BBC film crew


A man in northern London died after being mauled by his dog during an interview with a BBC documentary crew at his home, British media reported Wednesday.

Mario Perivoitos, 41, was talking with journalists at the apartment complex in London’s Wood Green neighborhood where he lived, when his Staffordshire bull terrier pounced on him, biting his neck, according to the Guardian.

The BBC crew called emergency services, who rushed Perivoitos to the hospital. He was pronounced dead two hours later.

The attack occurred March 20. An autopsy performed several days later concluded that Perivoitos died of “hypovolemic shock and damage to the airway consistent with a dog bite,” according to the BBC.

Police described the journalists as a man in his 20s and a woman in her 30s. The BBC declined to say why they were talking with Perivoitos.

The BBC said in a statement: “A crew making a BBC documentary were present — but not filming — at the time of the incident and called an ambulance. Given the ongoing inquiries, it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

Several neighbors told British media said they witnessed Perivoitos struggling to free himself from the dog’s jaws.

“I heard shouting, ‘Get him off! Get him off me!'” neighbor Geoff Morgan told the BBC. “He was shouting really loudly. He was bleeding from his neck. There was a lot of blood.”

Another neighbor told the Guardian that the dog had attacked Perivoitos at least once in recent memory.

“Six or seven months ago the dog bit him on the leg,” said the neighbor, identified only as Tayfun. “We heard him shout at the dog and he came running out with blood on his leg.”

Still, Tayfun added, Perivoitos “loved the dog more than himself.”

We have done this before many times this is
your copy and pasted argument that you usually go to when these threads pop up but as always you are not willing to recognize your stats are completely fucked up being compromised of four or more breeds. No one's going to argue that the number will still be higher than other breeds but the fact is it's completely skewed which makes most of your the stats you posted irrelevant

Btw your arguments are for pit apologists so don't tag me in them and come up with a solution rather than telling everyone what 4 different breeds can accumulate in terms of attacks.
 
Don't worry. He'll find that one story where an English Cocker Spaniel bit off the ear of a comatosed quadriplegic infant so that we will ignore all of the substantiated and numerous commonly reported horrors against humanity that pitbulls committed against full grown and fully capable people.
No lol I'm gonna go to work for the and day show you the stats and definitions that show what an abysmal failure the ban has been. Then you two can go back to shitting your pants when ever you see a mixed breed that resembles a pitbull.
 
Absurd, terrible, ignorant argument.


#1 DOG BITE STATISTICS RESOURCE
http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-recent-dog-bite-statistics.php


Empirical studies demonstrating the acute predisposition to violence among Pitbulls:
  1. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/images/dogbreeds-a.pdf
  2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610618/
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235708
  4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.12094/abstract
  5. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA381425
  6. http://blues.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Aut...ext=images/ejour/m_samj/m_samj_v97_n8_a16.pdf
  7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1424716/
  8. http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsur..._Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

Logical refutations of popular Pitbull apogism
  • Why are owners so much more likely to be bad owners if they own pits?
  • Why are witnesses so much more likely to mis-identify Pits vs. other breeds based on visual inspection? Why does this mathematically skew only one way?
  • Why are Pits' raw murder and mauling figures so absurdly high disproportionate to other large breeds that are similarly popular?
  • Where is the evidence to substantiate any of these popular, casual colloquialisms? For example, if you give a reason for why Pit Bull owners are more likely to be bad owners, do you have evidence to substantiate that?
  • Ask yourself: why are all of these rationalizations only applied to the defense of Pits, and never for other dogs?

Pit bulls make up 6% of the dog population and are responsible for 68% of dog attacks and 52% of dog-related deaths since 1982 as reported in a TIME magazine story "The Problem With Pit Bulls" by Charlotte Alter, June 20, 2014.

An April 2011 issue of Annals of Surgery reported that "these breeds should be regulated in the same way other dangerous species, such as leopards, are regulated." That report was shared with Time magazine by PETA, the animal-rights organization.


ZSJnUQ23DszYeMLhxXSSmMO5JYk8oL8uuVPQKBzZtND3NMJfboepdoy3VwHweKYUPwohhou8mzoG5aE-tCrb30QUt0D89JNNoBmNO0HeMgC8sC7Y14UqsybBGeTWizgzKcPo8Glz



http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/12-year-dog-bite-fatality-chart-dogsbiteorg.pdf

qcAI2UP4v5t5X9GK6jwQrcpvtGkABRBkOKz8TkMyqJGzFRwHqkmJgfxvl8Zg6-_DOgrDp9nTEpX5mxB8LZevIDW6pOMqoeiZ9HW3JcCB0oAUh5QXK4VUlCO5_3UoSnDz-7Rpwuq2




Dog Bite Statistics for 2016

83-k8I8jTGZ9deBY9DclOmky0CL9krdhe0BMt1YgRA3Nl7thjcRYHRZLLIWhhMUeeYt4ChK2dzXArQvH_qmvsJUNAn1T4ZVVOI-iDDaGZcTyakorAcPTe9Uo99lvewZM6An7ipUV



2016 dog bite fatalities
Statistical information gathered by DogsBite.org is verifiable1 through collected news reports. Our Fatality Citations section documents each source used in our dog bite-related fatality research.

2016 dog bite fatality statistics
  • 31 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2016. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 900 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 71% (22) of these deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6% of the total U.S. dog population.2
  • Together, pit bulls (22) and rottweilers (2), the second most lethal dog breed, accounted for 77% of the total recorded deaths in 2016. This same combination also accounted for 76% of all fatal attacks during the 12-year period of 2005 to 2016.
  • The breakdown between these two breeds is substantial over this 12-year period. From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days, versus rottweilers, which killed 43, a citizen every 102 days (Related graph).
  • In 2016, the combination of pit bulls (22), their close cousins, American bulldogs (2), and rottweilers (2) contributed to 84% (26) of all dog bite-related fatalities. Both American bulldog cases involved dogs acquired in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
  • Labradors and their mixes contributed to 3 deaths in 2016, followed by 6 breeds, each with 2 deaths: American bulldog, Belgian malinois, doberman pinscher, German shepherd, mixed-breed, rottweiler and 2 cases with unreleased breed data.
  • Annual data from 2016 shows that 42% (13) of the fatality victims were children ages 9-years and younger and 58% (18) were adults, ages 30-years and older. Of the total adults killed by canines in 2016, pit bulls were responsible for 67% (12).
  • In 2016, female victims (16) were greater in number than male victims (15). Among children ages 9-years and younger, male deaths were greater, 62% vs. 38% and among adults 59-years and older, female deaths outpaced males, 75% vs. 25%.
  • In 2016, infants 3 to 6-days old accounted for 31% of all child deaths. In one case, a pit bull-mix was lying in bed with the baby and its parents when it attacked. The family had adopted the dog 5-months earlier from the San Diego Humane Society.
  • 42% (13) of all dog bite fatality victims in 2016 were either visiting or living temporarily with the dog's owner when the fatal attack occurred, up from 32% in 2015. Of this subset of 13 fatalities, 77% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 32% (10) of attacks resulting in death involved a dog or person new to a household (0-2 month period). Children 9-years and younger accounted for 80% (8) of these deaths. Of this subset of 10 fatalities, 70% (7) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 61% (19) of all fatalities involved more than one dog, up from the 11-year average of 44% (2005 to 2015). 35% (11) of all deaths involved 2 or 3 dogs and 26% (8) involved a pack attack of 4 or more dogs, up from the 11-year average of 14%.
  • 29% (9) of all dog bite fatalities in 2016 involved breeding on the dog owner's property either actively or in the recent past; pit bulls accounted for 67% of these deaths. 3% (1) involved tethered dogs, down from the 11-year average of 10%.
  • Dog ownership information for 2016 shows that non-family dogs inflicted the majority of deaths, 55% (17). Of this subset, 59% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls. Conversely, only 19% (6) of attacks resulting in death occurred off the dog owner's property.
  • Family dogs inflicted 45% (14) of all deaths in 2016; family pit bulls accounted for 86% (12) of these deaths, up from an 11-year average of 63%. Of the 22 fatal pit bull attacks, 55% (12) involved a family or household member vs. 45% (10) non-family.
  • In 2016, only 6% (2) of all deadly attacks resulted in meaningful criminal charges; the lowest level on record.3 2016 also marked the first time a police officer's "personal" attack-trained K-9 killed a person; he was charged with two felonies.
  • California led all states in fatal attacks in 2016 incurring 6 deaths; 67% of these deaths were inflicted by pit bulls. Florida, North Carolina and Texas each followed with 3 deaths. South Carolina, a routine dog bite fatality state, incurred no deaths.
  • See: Discussion notes | See: Full news release
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed (2005 to 2016)
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Age Groups
  • See: 2016 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs
  • Social Media Graphic: 2016 U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Statistics
  • Social Media Graphic: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed

Death & Mauling Statistics for Niagara Falls, NY
eIpYQHTmn45Y-ub7BBWKaFqaZCLBu0W6yyM8PF3vTJq6TSWyy2N_su7T8By1D8yQgzxYRcwL_1Bfl5ldPDHP_DUrj6A5Ct_OtDCmz8ndNuHCcGQ9od60eKbIv5WeKbrr1BCJOqxz



Washington Post: Dog mauls owner to death during interview with BBC film crew


A man in northern London died after being mauled by his dog during an interview with a BBC documentary crew at his home, British media reported Wednesday.

Mario Perivoitos, 41, was talking with journalists at the apartment complex in London’s Wood Green neighborhood where he lived, when his Staffordshire bull terrier pounced on him, biting his neck, according to the Guardian.

The BBC crew called emergency services, who rushed Perivoitos to the hospital. He was pronounced dead two hours later.

The attack occurred March 20. An autopsy performed several days later concluded that Perivoitos died of “hypovolemic shock and damage to the airway consistent with a dog bite,” according to the BBC.

Police described the journalists as a man in his 20s and a woman in her 30s. The BBC declined to say why they were talking with Perivoitos.

The BBC said in a statement: “A crew making a BBC documentary were present — but not filming — at the time of the incident and called an ambulance. Given the ongoing inquiries, it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

Several neighbors told British media said they witnessed Perivoitos struggling to free himself from the dog’s jaws.

“I heard shouting, ‘Get him off! Get him off me!'” neighbor Geoff Morgan told the BBC. “He was shouting really loudly. He was bleeding from his neck. There was a lot of blood.”

Another neighbor told the Guardian that the dog had attacked Perivoitos at least once in recent memory.

“Six or seven months ago the dog bit him on the leg,” said the neighbor, identified only as Tayfun. “We heard him shout at the dog and he came running out with blood on his leg.”

Still, Tayfun added, Perivoitos “loved the dog more than himself.”



Mick smashed one outta the stands.
 
Mick smashed one outta the stands.

Not really


When you realize that a pitbull= 4 different breeds his argument sort of collapses to a more manageable "But even still they are more dangerous.....not epedemic level dangerous but still!". Watch you will see it happen

When I come home from work we will have that argument, we do it every so often, this is just what he wrote one night and copy and pastes in the event of a thread like this
 
every time i see a pitbulls face i just want to go play with them
 
Absurd, terrible, ignorant argument.


#1 DOG BITE STATISTICS RESOURCE
http://www.dogsbite.org/dogsbite-recent-dog-bite-statistics.php


Empirical studies demonstrating the acute predisposition to violence among Pitbulls:
  1. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/images/dogbreeds-a.pdf
  2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610618/
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235708
  4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.12094/abstract
  5. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA381425
  6. http://blues.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Aut...ext=images/ejour/m_samj/m_samj_v97_n8_a16.pdf
  7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1424716/
  8. http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsur..._Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

Logical refutations of popular Pitbull apogism
  • Why are owners so much more likely to be bad owners if they own pits?
  • Why are witnesses so much more likely to mis-identify Pits vs. other breeds based on visual inspection? Why does this mathematically skew only one way?
  • Why are Pits' raw murder and mauling figures so absurdly high disproportionate to other large breeds that are similarly popular?
  • Where is the evidence to substantiate any of these popular, casual colloquialisms? For example, if you give a reason for why Pit Bull owners are more likely to be bad owners, do you have evidence to substantiate that?
  • Ask yourself: why are all of these rationalizations only applied to the defense of Pits, and never for other dogs?

Pit bulls make up 6% of the dog population and are responsible for 68% of dog attacks and 52% of dog-related deaths since 1982 as reported in a TIME magazine story "The Problem With Pit Bulls" by Charlotte Alter, June 20, 2014.

An April 2011 issue of Annals of Surgery reported that "these breeds should be regulated in the same way other dangerous species, such as leopards, are regulated." That report was shared with Time magazine by PETA, the animal-rights organization.


ZSJnUQ23DszYeMLhxXSSmMO5JYk8oL8uuVPQKBzZtND3NMJfboepdoy3VwHweKYUPwohhou8mzoG5aE-tCrb30QUt0D89JNNoBmNO0HeMgC8sC7Y14UqsybBGeTWizgzKcPo8Glz



http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/12-year-dog-bite-fatality-chart-dogsbiteorg.pdf

qcAI2UP4v5t5X9GK6jwQrcpvtGkABRBkOKz8TkMyqJGzFRwHqkmJgfxvl8Zg6-_DOgrDp9nTEpX5mxB8LZevIDW6pOMqoeiZ9HW3JcCB0oAUh5QXK4VUlCO5_3UoSnDz-7Rpwuq2




Dog Bite Statistics for 2016

83-k8I8jTGZ9deBY9DclOmky0CL9krdhe0BMt1YgRA3Nl7thjcRYHRZLLIWhhMUeeYt4ChK2dzXArQvH_qmvsJUNAn1T4ZVVOI-iDDaGZcTyakorAcPTe9Uo99lvewZM6An7ipUV



2016 dog bite fatalities
Statistical information gathered by DogsBite.org is verifiable1 through collected news reports. Our Fatality Citations section documents each source used in our dog bite-related fatality research.

2016 dog bite fatality statistics
  • 31 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2016. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 900 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 71% (22) of these deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6% of the total U.S. dog population.2
  • Together, pit bulls (22) and rottweilers (2), the second most lethal dog breed, accounted for 77% of the total recorded deaths in 2016. This same combination also accounted for 76% of all fatal attacks during the 12-year period of 2005 to 2016.
  • The breakdown between these two breeds is substantial over this 12-year period. From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days, versus rottweilers, which killed 43, a citizen every 102 days (Related graph).
  • In 2016, the combination of pit bulls (22), their close cousins, American bulldogs (2), and rottweilers (2) contributed to 84% (26) of all dog bite-related fatalities. Both American bulldog cases involved dogs acquired in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
  • Labradors and their mixes contributed to 3 deaths in 2016, followed by 6 breeds, each with 2 deaths: American bulldog, Belgian malinois, doberman pinscher, German shepherd, mixed-breed, rottweiler and 2 cases with unreleased breed data.
  • Annual data from 2016 shows that 42% (13) of the fatality victims were children ages 9-years and younger and 58% (18) were adults, ages 30-years and older. Of the total adults killed by canines in 2016, pit bulls were responsible for 67% (12).
  • In 2016, female victims (16) were greater in number than male victims (15). Among children ages 9-years and younger, male deaths were greater, 62% vs. 38% and among adults 59-years and older, female deaths outpaced males, 75% vs. 25%.
  • In 2016, infants 3 to 6-days old accounted for 31% of all child deaths. In one case, a pit bull-mix was lying in bed with the baby and its parents when it attacked. The family had adopted the dog 5-months earlier from the San Diego Humane Society.
  • 42% (13) of all dog bite fatality victims in 2016 were either visiting or living temporarily with the dog's owner when the fatal attack occurred, up from 32% in 2015. Of this subset of 13 fatalities, 77% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 32% (10) of attacks resulting in death involved a dog or person new to a household (0-2 month period). Children 9-years and younger accounted for 80% (8) of these deaths. Of this subset of 10 fatalities, 70% (7) were inflicted by pit bulls.
  • In 2016, 61% (19) of all fatalities involved more than one dog, up from the 11-year average of 44% (2005 to 2015). 35% (11) of all deaths involved 2 or 3 dogs and 26% (8) involved a pack attack of 4 or more dogs, up from the 11-year average of 14%.
  • 29% (9) of all dog bite fatalities in 2016 involved breeding on the dog owner's property either actively or in the recent past; pit bulls accounted for 67% of these deaths. 3% (1) involved tethered dogs, down from the 11-year average of 10%.
  • Dog ownership information for 2016 shows that non-family dogs inflicted the majority of deaths, 55% (17). Of this subset, 59% (10) were inflicted by pit bulls. Conversely, only 19% (6) of attacks resulting in death occurred off the dog owner's property.
  • Family dogs inflicted 45% (14) of all deaths in 2016; family pit bulls accounted for 86% (12) of these deaths, up from an 11-year average of 63%. Of the 22 fatal pit bull attacks, 55% (12) involved a family or household member vs. 45% (10) non-family.
  • In 2016, only 6% (2) of all deadly attacks resulted in meaningful criminal charges; the lowest level on record.3 2016 also marked the first time a police officer's "personal" attack-trained K-9 killed a person; he was charged with two felonies.
  • California led all states in fatal attacks in 2016 incurring 6 deaths; 67% of these deaths were inflicted by pit bulls. Florida, North Carolina and Texas each followed with 3 deaths. South Carolina, a routine dog bite fatality state, incurred no deaths.
  • See: Discussion notes | See: Full news release
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed (2005 to 2016)
  • See: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Age Groups
  • See: 2016 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs
  • Social Media Graphic: 2016 U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Statistics
  • Social Media Graphic: 12-Year U.S. Dog Bite Fatality Chart by Breed

Death & Mauling Statistics for Niagara Falls, NY
eIpYQHTmn45Y-ub7BBWKaFqaZCLBu0W6yyM8PF3vTJq6TSWyy2N_su7T8By1D8yQgzxYRcwL_1Bfl5ldPDHP_DUrj6A5Ct_OtDCmz8ndNuHCcGQ9od60eKbIv5WeKbrr1BCJOqxz



Washington Post: Dog mauls owner to death during interview with BBC film crew


A man in northern London died after being mauled by his dog during an interview with a BBC documentary crew at his home, British media reported Wednesday.

Mario Perivoitos, 41, was talking with journalists at the apartment complex in London’s Wood Green neighborhood where he lived, when his Staffordshire bull terrier pounced on him, biting his neck, according to the Guardian.

The BBC crew called emergency services, who rushed Perivoitos to the hospital. He was pronounced dead two hours later.

The attack occurred March 20. An autopsy performed several days later concluded that Perivoitos died of “hypovolemic shock and damage to the airway consistent with a dog bite,” according to the BBC.

Police described the journalists as a man in his 20s and a woman in her 30s. The BBC declined to say why they were talking with Perivoitos.

The BBC said in a statement: “A crew making a BBC documentary were present — but not filming — at the time of the incident and called an ambulance. Given the ongoing inquiries, it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

Several neighbors told British media said they witnessed Perivoitos struggling to free himself from the dog’s jaws.

“I heard shouting, ‘Get him off! Get him off me!'” neighbor Geoff Morgan told the BBC. “He was shouting really loudly. He was bleeding from his neck. There was a lot of blood.”

Another neighbor told the Guardian that the dog had attacked Perivoitos at least once in recent memory.

“Six or seven months ago the dog bit him on the leg,” said the neighbor, identified only as Tayfun. “We heard him shout at the dog and he came running out with blood on his leg.”

Still, Tayfun added, Perivoitos “loved the dog more than himself.”



Define 'pit bull'?

I'm not trying to be a smart ass, but do you mean any dog that shares physical characteristics with what we think looks like a 'pit bull'?

I grew up in a rural community with a neighbour who had APBTs. There were small, non-descript animal. I now live in Toronto, and even though pit bulls are banned here, there are lots of big, mean looking dogs in the bad areas that people call pit bulls.
 
I can provide a bit of additional background on this issue, being from Montreal:

The initial ban was instated under the previous mayoral leadership. In typical Denis Coderre style, it was done without sufficient public consultation and went into effect too fast with too many questions left open on how to deal with all the remaining pitbulls in Montreal. Again in typical Coderre fashion, a proper public debate was not had, which resulted in actual good arguments for the ban to be lost on the general public and instead, the voices of the anti-ban side were heard loud and clear in news outlets. Many pictures of cute and obedient pitbulls later, and pretty soon, public opinion shifted against the ban, and the current mayor made it a part of her platform to overturn the ban.

Anyway

As I see it, there are two distinct problems when it comes to pitbulls:

1. Dogs freak out. It happens. The problem is obviously that when a pitbull freaks out, people die, as opposed to the vast majority of other dog breeds.
2. Owners (duh). From what I can tell, the vast majority of pitbull owners fall under the 3 categories:

a) the tough guy who uses the pitbull as some extension of his own self image. These are the guys who have male pitbulls they refuse to neuter, the typical negative image of the pitbull owner. This reputation is rightfully deserves, having a pitbull with his nuts in take is absolutely insane and should be forbidden under law.

b) women who use the pitbulls similarly, only here they're projecting a picture of their perfect man: a strong, tough character who can protect them, but is cuddly and sweet at home. This is only sslightly down on the retardation scale from group A.

c) reformers, who get pitbulls to prove how great these dogs are, but most of the time it's to prove how great they are training at dogs. Again, an ultimately completely self-centered approach to dog ownership.

Then there are obviously normal people who just spot a cute puppy at the shelter and bring him home.

IMO opinion the ban should have stayed. The world isn't a worse place with less pitbulls in it, there's no shortage of dogs and if cuddly and friendly is what you're looking for, there are 100s of breeds to choose from. But bad owners will stay bad owners and if you ban pitbulls and other aggressive breeds, they'll just use German Shepards for the same purpose. We need tougher legislation on dog owners. A ban alone won't do.
 
I bet muslims have killed and hurt more than pit bulls. When are they going to ban them?
 
Dogs, but especially pit bulls and a few others should have to be muzzled when out of their yard. I don't know why this isn't the case, or why owners would be against it.
All dogs should attend obedience classes and attain a specific level.
 
The simple answer to all this might be: if I lose control of my dog, how dangerous will my dog be to me, my family, and neighbors?
 
I bet muslims have killed and hurt more than pit bulls. When are they going to ban them?

When we ban Communists, Fascist, Libertarians, Green Parties, and the free will and association of mankind. Bad idea.
 
As a Cuban I’m saddened by this ban lift. Enjoy your shitty repetitive songs and lyrics Canada. Pitbul sucks
 
Back
Top