O
Overtures
Guest
I haven't read much of this but I think it's interesting how easy it is to rephrase things in order to see your fav president in a favorable light. For instance, @AviatorShades has said that Trump is stupid but still better than Obama/Clinton because his policies have yet to result in disaster.
Thats absurd; Shades moved the goalpost to such a specific criterion that it's almost impossible to judge a president. After thinking about that, I wondered if I had done the same thing. The answer is that, yes, I have rephrased success with the express purpose of finding a positive.
Obviously, there's substance to this rephrasing worth unpacking, which I really didn't do much of in the OP. At any rate, I'm not a bitch.
Lastly, I think we should stick to a general/broad criteria when judging a president: a little bit of this, a little bit of that, etc. If we do this, we force ourselves to be bi-partisan to some extent, plus we get a better picture.
That said, Trump doesn't pass the eyeball test from the start.
He blows a dick, and if he succeeds where Obama failed, it's almost irrelevant.
Thats absurd; Shades moved the goalpost to such a specific criterion that it's almost impossible to judge a president. After thinking about that, I wondered if I had done the same thing. The answer is that, yes, I have rephrased success with the express purpose of finding a positive.
Obviously, there's substance to this rephrasing worth unpacking, which I really didn't do much of in the OP. At any rate, I'm not a bitch.
Lastly, I think we should stick to a general/broad criteria when judging a president: a little bit of this, a little bit of that, etc. If we do this, we force ourselves to be bi-partisan to some extent, plus we get a better picture.
That said, Trump doesn't pass the eyeball test from the start.
He blows a dick, and if he succeeds where Obama failed, it's almost irrelevant.