But yet it was the rule at the time. Regardless of how stupid we find it now. It is the athlete’s responsibility to know the rules. Not to decide whether they make sense or not.Cause the rule is dumb and we know why it's in place and it's not a logical reason.
Not sure how this can be a DQ loss when Rumble has a loss via eye poke lol, usually when this kind of thing happens it's only a DQ if it not only stopped the fight but was also deemed intentional. Those were the first 12-6 elbows he threw after landing like 50 legit elbows. It's also worth nothing that it was Mazagatti reffing when Rumble lost via eye poke.... That shit should be changed to a NC
Exactly. This is for casuals. No stars in pipeline this is the only way to market him into something more than MM numbers with these mismatches. (Santos is live..)Stupid rule. Stupid ref. But them's the breaks. Nobody thinks of him as having a loss so who really cares?
LolI think his entire career would be expunged, as he is a cheating pussy.
But yet it was the rule at the time. Regardless of how stupid we find it now. It is the athlete’s responsibility to know the rules. Not to decide whether they make sense or not.
Dude that was beautiful, thank you for that. That’s the most sense anyone has made on here in a long time.Whether you agree with a rule or not, it is the law when it's in effect.
I got a speeding ticket for going 10 over, last year, and now the limit's been raised, should my ticket be voided.
That's called revisionist history kiddies, and, in short... grow the fuck up.