- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 61,055
- Reaction score
- 30,968
Yeah, NOW you are.Too bad I’m a Bernie bro.
Yeah, NOW you are.Too bad I’m a Bernie bro.
There was nothing magical about it. And again, it had nothing to do with Obama.So it's just a magical coincidence that you "evolved" (your words) your view on torture during the Obama years.
Too bad I’m a Bernie bro.
Sure. We believe you. Honestly.it had nothing to do with Obama.
So you won’t address the rest of my post? Homer is right, you’re a troll.Sure. We believe you. Honestly.
I can dig up the post if you want because it most certainly was during the Obama years.
So you won’t address the rest of my post? Homer is right, you’re a troll.
Btw, I didn’t say it wasn’t during the Obama years dummy.
Get the fugatta here.Yeah, NOW you are.
That’s revenue. Are you unaware taxes are currently lower now but receipts are higher?
Are you saying high taxes are driving growth? — can we at least agree that would be a disingenuous question just like yours??
High taxation is a drag on GDP growth - see the Obama economy. There I said it again. Deal with it.
The "Obama economy" was marked by extremely low taxes
Here again, do you have a point that has anything to do with what I was saying when you chose to engage me?
And yet your beloved Hillary voted for it.
And yet your beloved Hillary voted for it.
You are the one who disagreed with me based on Obama's first term.
The point being that while paying interest sucks, most of us see the value of credit and debt. It's not necessarily a good or bad thing.
It's more just a matter of this being how the game is played. If nobody borrowed money the economy would crash.
Your memory is a bit hazy.
In the Senate 22 Dems (half) but just one Repug voted against the war.
In the House 127 Democrats (vast majority) but just six Repugs voted against.
Long story short: if Repuglicans had voted like Democrats it would have failed the House and been a tie in the Senate.
Aka, no war.