- Joined
- Aug 26, 2003
- Messages
- 30,459
- Reaction score
- 1,671
lolz @ believing an internet comedian/famed conspiracy theorist was an insider of wikileaks.
You forgot 'renowned cuck'.
lolz @ believing an internet comedian/famed conspiracy theorist was an insider of wikileaks.
Big deal. Only a DC jury could convict this man. It’s 90%+ Democrat.
Hopefully he wins his appeal or gets a pardon.
The rule of law party right here for you folks!!
Let's talk after declass/fisa abuse is out.Because of course nobody with any political affiliation can be trusted to tell the truth.
Right?
And a green cloud of poisonous swamp gas......Is the government stupid enough to think that this man wont break out of Arkham within a week? Likely with help from a trick umbrella.
Roger Stone should've hired better lawyers then. It's on lawyers to get jurors struck for cause.Former Obama insider Sylvia Burwell was selected as a juror for Roger Stone’s trial
Lol no standard libs have no problem with this
And a green cloud of poisonous swamp gas......Is the government stupid enough to think that this man wont break out of Arkham within a week? Likely with help from a trick umbrella.
No, let's talk right now.Let's talk after declass/fisa abuse is out.
What would you say if a Nebraska prosecutor indicted David Axelrod because of his role in the Obama campaign, and a Nebraska jury convicted him? You’d say it was politically motivated. It would certainly appear that way.
As it so happens, government business is conducted out of DC, so the prosecutions and convictions reflect that bias. Everyone knows Stone was targeted because of his association with Trump, and nothing more.
we can't even trust people like liddle Schiff to read a memo without making up his own story. Lol let's call it a parodyNo, let's talk right now.
Are you saying anyone with political affiliation, meaning any politician, is someone who can't be trusted to tell the truth?
Generaly speaking I am am not in the habit of disregarding the rule of law for partisan reasons.
Source?Former Obama insider Sylvia Burwell was selected as a juror for Roger Stone’s trial
Lol no standard libs have no problem with this
lol you have a high opinion on Nebraskan natives, I take it.What would you say if a Nebraska prosecutor indicted David Axelrod because of his role in the Obama campaign, and a Nebraska jury convicted him? You’d say it was politically motivated. It would certainly appear that way.
As it so happens, government business is conducted out of DC, so the prosecutions and convictions reflect that bias. Everyone knows Stone was targeted because of his association with Trump, and nothing more.
lol you have a high opinion on Nebraskan natives, I take it.
Are you in favor of weaponizing “rule of law” for partisan reasons?
Only the best people.It must be a coincidence that all these guys working for Trump are in jail or in hot water.