- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 420
- Reaction score
- 9
I would like to start a discussion on the merits of doing forms (or katas) as we see in most "traditional" martial arts, versus the more free flow shadowboxing movements we see in combat sports like boxing and MT.
As far as I know, combat sports don't have what I would consider forms, but they do have drills in stances, footwork, combinations, and shadowboxing. Perhaps practicing combinations and the accompanying footwork and evasion are the closest thing, but they still differ considerably from the formalized sequence of movements that can span over 100 successive postures in one form. And correct me if I am wrong, but shadowboxing is not a key element to most TMAs (I'm thinking Gung Fu and Karate). Perhaps the forms emerged from shadowboxing in ages past, but have been distilled into the sequences we see today, while shadowboxing has been largely forgotten.
Coming from a WC background, I am very familiar with the heavy emphasis put on learning and mastering the forms. I personally hate doing them, which is why I much prefer the art of shadowboxing where I can move freely and use my imagination to string together offence, defence, footwork, etc. However I do not think we should dismiss forms wholesale and throw out the baby with the bathwater. There is obviously some value in them as evidenced by their pervasiveness alone. I would like to make an attempt to formulate some pros and cons of both approaches:
Forms:
Pros- provides a library of techniques so that every move is practiced each time and nothing is forgotten. Protects the art and helps ensure that the moveset is passed onto the next generation. Many times they have "layers" so that many ideas and concepts can be hidden. A relatively easy way for beginners to practice the move set without needing an advanced understanding of the art.
Cons:
Static, rote practice does not (in most cases) translate into free fighting without detailed explanation from a qualified teacher. Takes a lot of time to practice and memorize when you could perhaps learn the same skills better from 2 man drills.
Shadowboxing:
Pros- Free form, flexible, fluid. Any move can be practiced at any time in isolation or combination with any other move. Translates almost directly to actual fighting (more or less depending on the imagination and skill of the individual).
Cons- requires some imagination and/or experience sparring/fighting, so its not a skill picked up easily by beginners. Certain techniques and strategies may be easily neglected.
To me, shadowboxing is an elusive yet powerful skill that everyone should practice. But traditional forms have value too.
What about you guys? Do you prefer one over the other or do both? Anything to add or dispute about my thoughts?
As far as I know, combat sports don't have what I would consider forms, but they do have drills in stances, footwork, combinations, and shadowboxing. Perhaps practicing combinations and the accompanying footwork and evasion are the closest thing, but they still differ considerably from the formalized sequence of movements that can span over 100 successive postures in one form. And correct me if I am wrong, but shadowboxing is not a key element to most TMAs (I'm thinking Gung Fu and Karate). Perhaps the forms emerged from shadowboxing in ages past, but have been distilled into the sequences we see today, while shadowboxing has been largely forgotten.
Coming from a WC background, I am very familiar with the heavy emphasis put on learning and mastering the forms. I personally hate doing them, which is why I much prefer the art of shadowboxing where I can move freely and use my imagination to string together offence, defence, footwork, etc. However I do not think we should dismiss forms wholesale and throw out the baby with the bathwater. There is obviously some value in them as evidenced by their pervasiveness alone. I would like to make an attempt to formulate some pros and cons of both approaches:
Forms:
Pros- provides a library of techniques so that every move is practiced each time and nothing is forgotten. Protects the art and helps ensure that the moveset is passed onto the next generation. Many times they have "layers" so that many ideas and concepts can be hidden. A relatively easy way for beginners to practice the move set without needing an advanced understanding of the art.
Cons:
Static, rote practice does not (in most cases) translate into free fighting without detailed explanation from a qualified teacher. Takes a lot of time to practice and memorize when you could perhaps learn the same skills better from 2 man drills.
Shadowboxing:
Pros- Free form, flexible, fluid. Any move can be practiced at any time in isolation or combination with any other move. Translates almost directly to actual fighting (more or less depending on the imagination and skill of the individual).
Cons- requires some imagination and/or experience sparring/fighting, so its not a skill picked up easily by beginners. Certain techniques and strategies may be easily neglected.
To me, shadowboxing is an elusive yet powerful skill that everyone should practice. But traditional forms have value too.
What about you guys? Do you prefer one over the other or do both? Anything to add or dispute about my thoughts?